首页> 外文期刊>Bone marrow transplantation >Allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): results of a provincial strategy. Ontario BMT Network, Canada.
【24h】

Allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): results of a provincial strategy. Ontario BMT Network, Canada.

机译:非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的同种异体或自体骨髓移植(BMT):一项省级策略的结果。加拿大安大略省BMT网络。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In 1986, the bone marrow transplant centers in Ontario agreed to a strategy for the treatment of patients with NHL. Suitable patients would undergo autotransplant but be referred for allotransplant if they had persistent marrow involvement or an inadequate marrow/stem cell harvest. Data of all patients were recorded in a database. We reviewed this database to compare these transplant modalities with respect to overall survival, rate of relapse and treatment-related mortality. Between January 1986 and August 1997, 429 patients underwent BMT for NHL - 385 autotransplants and 44 allotransplants. Sixty-eight percent of patients received their transplant for aggressive NHL, while the others had indolent lymphoma. Three-year actuarial survival did not differ between allogeneic and autologous BMT: 71% vs 62%, respectively (P = 0.5330 by log-rank testing). Three-year actuarial rate of relapse was lower after allotransplant than autotransplant: 6% vs 41%, respectively (P = 0.0006 by log-rank testing). Treatment-related mortality was higher after allotransplant than autotransplant: 23% vs 6%, respectively (P = 0.001 by chi2 analysis). For further comparison, autotransplant patients were randomly matched 2:1 with the allotransplant patients for age +/- 5 years, disease status at BMT, disease histology, and year of BMT. In the matched comparison, survival did not differ (relative risk of death after allotransplant: 0.711 (95% CI: 0.309-1.637)). Relapse rate was significantly lower in the allotransplant group (relative risk of relapse for allotransplant: 0.190 (95% CI: 0.043-0.834)) and treatment-related mortality was not significantly different (relative risk for allotransplant: 1.425 (95% CI: 0.527-3.851)). In conclusion, a review of a provincial strategy for treatment of NHL, shows that survival is not different after allogeneic or autologous BMT, but the rate of relapse is lower after allotransplant. These data support continuing the current provincial strategy.
机译:1986年,安大略省的骨髓移植中心同意了一种治疗NHL患者的策略。合适的患者将接受自体移植,但如果他们持续受累于骨髓或骨髓/干细胞收获不足,则会被要求进行同种异体移植。所有患者的数据记录在数据库中。我们审查了该数据库,以比较这些移植方式相对于总生存率,复发率和与治疗相关的死亡率。在1986年1月至1997年8月之间,有429例患者接受了NHL的BMT治疗-385例自体移植和44例同种异体移植。 68%的患者因侵袭性NHL而接受了移植,而其他患者则患有惰性淋巴瘤。同种异体和自体BMT的三年精算生存率没有差异:分别为71%和62%(对数秩检验,P = 0.5330)。同种异体移植后的三年精算复发率分别比自体移植低:分别为6%和41%(按对数秩检验,P = 0.0006)。同种异体移植后与治疗相关的死亡率高于自体移植:分别为23%和6%(通过chi2分析,P = 0.001)。为了进一步比较,将年龄为+/- 5岁,BMT的疾病状态,疾病组织学和BMT年份的同种异体移植患者与同种异体移植患者进行2:1随机匹配。在配对比较中,存活率没有差异(同种异体移植后的相对死亡风险:0.711(95%CI:0.309-1.637))。同种异体移植组的复发率显着较低(同种异体移植的相对复发风险:0.190(95%CI:0.043-0.834)),治疗相关的死亡率无显着差异(同种异体移植的相对风险:1.425(95%CI:0.527) -3.851))。总之,对NHL的省级治疗策略的回顾表明,同种异体或自体BMT后的生存率没有差异,但同种异体移植后复发率较低。这些数据支持继续执行当前的省级战略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号