...
首页> 外文期刊>Archaeological prospection >Comparison of a stepped-frequency continuous wave and a pulsed GPR system
【24h】

Comparison of a stepped-frequency continuous wave and a pulsed GPR system

机译:步进频率连续波与脉冲GPR系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A new stepped-frequency continuous wave (SFCW) ground-penetrating radar (GPR) system was tested. The GPR uses a special arrangement of different antenna sizes to cover a large frequency bandwidth and to have a very close spacing between the air-coupled antennae, closer to the Nyquist sampling interval in a cross-line direction than is normally possible during conventional field recording. The data processing is described but is more complicated than for a pulsed system and very time-consuming. A new background removal in frequency domain has also been shown to be an alternative. Comparing data from this SFCW and a pulsed system reveals that there is no advantage using frequency domain technology with an air-coupled antenna. The penetration depth is even significantly reduced, and hence the stepped-frequency technology provides only reasonable data in about 20% of the cases where good data are recorded with a time domain system using a ground-coupled antenna, as tested on a wide variety of sites and applications. This can be explained by the bad coupling to the ground and the strong first reflection of the air-coupled antenna.
机译:测试了新的步进频率连续波(SFCW)探地雷达(GPR)系统。 GPR使用不同天线尺寸的特殊布置来覆盖较大的频率带宽,并且在空气耦合天线之间具有非常紧密的间距,在交叉线方向上比奈奎斯特采样间隔更近,这比常规现场记录中通常更可能。描述了数据处理,但是它比脉冲系统更为复杂并且非常耗时。频域上的新背景去除也已被证明是替代方法。比较此SFCW和脉冲系统的数据后发现,将频域技术与空气耦合天线一起使用没有任何优势。穿透深度甚至被大大降低,因此,步进频率技术仅在大约20%的情况下提供了合理的数据,这些情况是在时域系统中使用接地耦合天线记录的良好数据,该情况已在多种测试中进行了测试。网站和应用程序。这可以通过与地面的不良耦合和空气耦合天线的强烈的第一反射来解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号