...
首页> 外文期刊>Aquaculture >Truncation selection for BLUP-EBV and phenotypic values in fish breeding schemes.
【24h】

Truncation selection for BLUP-EBV and phenotypic values in fish breeding schemes.

机译:在鱼类育种方案中选择BLUP-EBV的截断选择和表型值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have compared rate of inbreeding ( Delta F) and genetic gain ( Delta G) in truncation selection schemes for fish on best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) estimated breeding values (EBVs; BTS) or phenotypic values (PTS) with one constraint on the number of tanks (100 or 200) to rear the families, e.g., until tagging size, and one constraint on the total number of selection candidates (3200 or 6400). Single trait selection was practiced for a trait with heritability of 0.1, 0.4 or 0.7 and 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 or 200 selected sires and dams were selected. When going from PTS to BTS, we found an overall increase of Delta G and Delta F of a factor of 0.07 and 1.45, respectively; that is, the increase of Delta G was moderate and accompanied by a dramatic increase of Delta F. In general, Delta F was reduced by increasing the number of tanks at a given number of selection candidates and by decreasing the number of selection candidates at a given number of tanks. Delta F was also reduced for schemes with high heritability because BLUP breeding value estimation then increases the weight on the individual's phenotype, which leads to a reduced correlation between BLUP estimated breeding values within a family, and fish from more families become selected. In practical fish breeding schemes, PTS seems preferable over BTS because BTS generally give unacceptable high Delta F (0.01) for these schemes with few but large families. PTS can, however, only be used for traits measured on the selection candidate, which makes PTS less valuable for schemes with comprehensible breeding goals, including, for example, growth, disease resistance, maturity and fillet quality traits. Several traits are measured today on sibs only.
机译:我们在最佳线性无偏预测(BLUP)估计育种值(EBVs; BTS)或表型值(PTS)上对鱼类有一个限制,在截断选择方案中比较了近亲繁殖率(Delta F)和遗传增益(Delta G)。数量(100或200)以养育这些家庭,例如直到标记大小,以及一个限制选择候选总数(3200或6400)。对遗传度为0.1、0.4或0.7的性状进行单性状选择,并选择5、10、20、50、100或200个父本和母本。从PTS到BTS时,我们发现Delta G和Delta F的总体增加分别为0.07和1.45。也就是说,Delta G的增加是适度的,并伴随着Delta F的急剧增加。通常,通过增加给定选择候选数量的坦克数量并减少A处的选择候选数量来减少DeltaF。给定数量的坦克。对于高遗传力的方案,Delta F也降低了,因为BLUP育种价值估计会增加个体表型的权重,这会导致一个家庭内部BLUP育种估计值之间的相关性降低,并且会选择更多家庭的鱼。在实际的鱼类育种方案中,PTS似乎比BTS更可取,因为对于数量少而又大的家庭,BTS通常给这些方案带来不可接受的高Delta F( 0.01)。但是,PTS仅可用于选择候选者所测得的性状,这使PTS对于具有可育目标的计划(包括例如生长,抗病性,成熟度和鱼片品质性状)的价值较低。今天仅在同胞上测量几个特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号