...
首页> 外文期刊>Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems >Dynamics of fish assemblages on coral reefs subjected to different management regimes in the Abrolhos Bank, eastern Brazil
【24h】

Dynamics of fish assemblages on coral reefs subjected to different management regimes in the Abrolhos Bank, eastern Brazil

机译:巴西东部阿伯罗霍斯银行在不同管理制度下在珊瑚礁上的鱼类种群动态

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

1.Marine protected areas (MPAs) range from multiple-use areas (MUA) to absolute no-take reserves (NTR). Despite their importance for fisheries management, there are few long-term studies comparing benefits from different types of MPAs within the same region.2.Fish assemblages were monitored for five years (2001-2005) in the largest coral reefs in the South Atlantic (Abrolhos Bank, Brazil). Monitoring included one community-based MUA, two NTRs (one established in 1983 and another in 2001), and one unprotected area. Benthic assemblages at these areas, as well as fish assemblages on unprotected deeper reefs (25-35 m), were monitored from 2003 onwards.3.Habitat characteristics strongly influenced fish assemblages' structure. This, together with the lack of data from before establishment of the MPAs, did not allow an unequivocal analysis of the effects of the MPAs.4.Biomass of commercially important fish, particularly small carnivores, was higher in the older NTR. Biomass of black grouper Mycteroperca bonaci increased by 30-fold inside NTRs during the study period, while remaining consistently low elsewhere.5.A single herbivore species, the parrotfish Scarus trispinosus, dominated fish assemblages (28.3% of total biomass). Biomass of this species increased in 2002 on the younger NTR and on the MUA, soon after establishment of the former and banning of the parrotfish fishery in the latter. This increase was followed by a decline from 2003 onwards, after increased poaching and reopening of the parrotfish fishery.6.Fish biomass increased in 2002 across the entire region. This increase was stronger in sites closer to deeper reefs, where fish biomass was up to 30-times higher than shallow reefs: movement of fish from deeper to shallower areas may have played a role.7.The effective use of MPAs in the Abrolhos Bank is still dependent on adequate enforcement and the protection of critical habitats such as deep reefs and mangroves. Copyright pb 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:1,海洋保护区(MPA)范围从多次使用区(MUA)到绝对禁止捕捞量(NTR)。尽管它们在渔业管理中具有重要意义,但很少有长期的研究来比较同一地区内不同类型MPA的益处2.在南大西洋最大的珊瑚礁(2001-2005年)中对鱼类​​种群进行了五年(2001-2005年)监测。巴西阿伯罗霍斯银行)。监测包括一个基于社区的MUA,两个NTR(一个在1983年建立,另一个在2001年建立)以及一个未保护区。从2003年开始,对这些地区的底栖动物群以及未保护的更深的珊瑚礁(25-35 m)上的鱼类群进行了监测。3生境特征严重影响了鱼类群的结构。再加上在建立MPA之前缺乏数据,就不能对MPA的影响进行明确的分析。4。在较老的NTR中,具有商业意义的鱼类,尤其是小型食肉动物的生物量较高。在研究期间,黑色石斑鱼Mycteroperca bonaci的生物量在NTR内部增加了30倍,而在其他地方却始终保持较低水平。5。单一的食草动物种类(鹦鹉鱼Scarus trispinosus)在鱼群中占主导地位(占总生物量的28.3%)。在前者成立和禁止后者的鹦鹉鱼捕捞之后不久,该物种的生物量在2002年在较年轻的NTR和MUA上有所增加。这种增加之后,随着盗猎和捕捞鱼类渔业的重新开放增加,从2003年开始下降。6。2002年整个区域的鱼类生物量都增加了。这种增加在更靠近深礁的地方更强,那里的鱼类生物量比浅礁高30倍:鱼从较深区域向较浅区域的移动可能起到了作用。7。阿伯罗霍斯银行有效利用海洋保护区仍然取决于适当的执法和对关键栖息地(如深礁和红树林)的保护。版权所有pb 2008 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号