...
首页> 外文期刊>Aquatic Botany >Seed bank responses to wetland restoration: do restored wetlands resemble reference conditions following sediment removal?
【24h】

Seed bank responses to wetland restoration: do restored wetlands resemble reference conditions following sediment removal?

机译:种子库对湿地恢复的反应:去除沉积物后恢复的湿地是否类似于参考条件?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Sedimentation and alterations of natural hydroperiods from watershed cultivation have affected most depressional wetlands in the Great Plains. This can result in altered plant community structure through changes in water availability and depth as well as burial of seed banks. The vegetation and seed banks of 15 wetlands were sampled within the Rainwater Basin Region of Nebraska. Our objectives were to: (1) compare wetland seed bank communities among wetlands with different watershed land uses (reference, restored and impacted by watershed cultivation); (2) determine the available seed bank following sediment removal and establish if wetland zonation occurs in the deeper sediment layer of pre-scraped agricultural wetlands; and (3) determine the similarity between extant vegetation and the seed banks for each wetland land use treatment. There were no significant differences in seed bank species richness and the number and composition of annual, perennial, native, or exotic species among reference, restored, and agricultural playas. Restored wetlands had a greater number of upland species germinate from the surface soil seed bank compared to reference and agricultural playas. Availability of seeds after 30 cm of soil was removed (to simulate available seed bank if the wetland was to be restored) in crop land use wetlands was low (2-52 seeds/wetland) making determination of wetland zonation difficult. There was no difference in the similarity between the seed bank and extant vegetation among the three land use treatments. Sediment removal appears to be successful in removing weedy and exotic species from the seed bank; however, the seed bank is not the primary source for playa wetland revegetation. Restored and reference wetlands have similar seed bank community characteristics (i.e., richness) however, each wetland land use treatment was associated with differing plant species and plant guilds.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2013.02.002
机译:流域耕作产生的自然水文期的沉积和变化影响了大平原的大多数洼地湿地。通过改变水的供应量和深度,以及埋下种子库,可以导致植物群落结构的改变。在内布拉斯加州的雨水盆地地区对15个湿地的植被和种子库进行了采样。我们的目标是:(1)比较流域土地用途不同(参考,恢复和受流域耕作影响)的湿地之间的湿地种子库群落; (2)确定去除沉积物后的可用种子库,并确定在预先刮除的农业湿地的较深沉积层中是否发生湿地分区; (3)确定每种湿地土地利用处理中现存植被与种子库之间的相似性。在参考,恢复和农业用草丛中,种子库物种的丰富度以及一年生,多年生,本土或外来物种的数量和组成没有显着差异。与参考和农业Playas相比,恢复的湿地从表层土壤种子库中萌发的山地物种数量更多。除去30 cm的土壤后,种子的可利用性(如果要恢复湿地,则模拟可用的种子库)在耕地用途中的湿地很低(2-52种子/湿地),因此很难确定湿地的分区。在三种土地利用处理方式之间,种子库和现有植被之间的相似性没有差异。清除沉积物似乎可以成功地从种子库中清除杂草和外来物种。然而,种子库并不是普拉亚湿地植被恢复的主要来源。恢复的湿地和参考湿地具有相似的种子库群落特征(即丰富度),但是,每种湿地土地利用处理方式都与不同的植物物种和植物行会相关。Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot .2013.02.002

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号