...
首页> 外文期刊>Arabian journal of geosciences >Solute geothermometry of Cerro Prieto and Los Humeros geothermal fields, Mexico: considerations on chemical characteristics of thermal water
【24h】

Solute geothermometry of Cerro Prieto and Los Humeros geothermal fields, Mexico: considerations on chemical characteristics of thermal water

机译:墨西哥Cerro Prieto和Los Humeros地热田的溶质地热法:对热水化学特性的考虑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A comprehensive study on the chemical considerations of thermal waters (springs and geothermal wells) on the performance of solute geothermometers in predicting the reservoir temperatures of Cerro Prieto and los Humeros geothermal fields of Mexico has been carried out. The reservoir temperatures from these thermal waters were calculated by applying all the available 28 solute geothermometers and the obtained temperatures were compared with the bottom hole temperatures (BHT) of the geothermal wells. Thermal waters of springs and geothermal wells of Cerro Prieto geothermal field (CPGF) are Cl type and majority of them are partially equilibrated. In the case of Los Humeros geothermal field (LHGF), spring waters are HCO3 type and all of them have indicated non-equilibrium conditions. Majority of the predicted reservoir temperatures by Na/K geothermometers from spring waters of CPGF and LHGF are within +/- 20 % differences compared to average BHTs, whereas estimated temperatures by all other solute geothermometers (non-Na/K) from spring waters of both the geothermal fields have shown wide differences (> +/- 20 %). In the case of geothermal well waters, majority of the reservoir temperatures estimated by only Na/K geothermometers from well waters of CPGF are within +/- 20 % differences and in the case of wells of LHGF, majority of the reservoir temperatures estimates by all solute geothermometers are having differences > +/- 20 %. The present study indicates the following: (1) only 3 geothermometers (out of 28) from spring waters of CPGF have predicted reservoir temperatures similar (statistically no significant differences) to the average of BHTs, although all springs are of Cl type; (2) different chemical characteristics of spring and well waters of CPGF and LHGF may be the result of the wide differences in the lithology of their reservoirs; (3) more number of solute geothermometers from non-equilibrated spring waters of CPGF and LHGF have predicted reliable reservoir temperatures than partially equilibrated waters; (4) In general, Na/K geothermometers have predicted more reliable reservoir temperatures from spring and well waters of both geothermal fields, when compared to other solute geothermometers; (5) the prediction of non-reliable reservoir temperatures by other than Na/K geothermometers may be the result of dilution/ mixing of deep thermal waters with the meteoric surface waters; and (6) more number of geothermometers have predicted reliable reservoir temperatures from well waters in comparison to spring waters of both the studied geothermal fields.
机译:进行了关于热水(泉水和地热井)的化学因素对溶质地温度计的性能的综合研究,以预测墨西哥的Cerro Prieto和los Humeros地热田的储层温度。通过应用所有可用的28种溶质地热仪来计算这些热水中的储层温度,并将获得的温度与地热井的井底温度(BHT)进行比较。 Cerro Prieto地热田(CPGF)的温泉和地热井的温泉水为Cl型,其中大部分已部分平衡。在Los Humeros地热场(LHGF)的情况下,泉水是HCO3类型的,并且都表明存在非平衡条件。与平均BHT相比,由CPGF和LHGF泉水的Na / K地热仪预测的储层温度的大多数差异在+/- 20%之内,而由所有其他溶质地温度计(非Na / K)的泉水的估算温度的大部分两个地热场都显示出很大的差异(> +/- 20%)。就地热井水而言,仅由Na / K地热仪从CPGF井水中估算出的大部分储层温度差异在+/- 20%之内,而对于LHGF井而言,所有储层温度均由所有人估算溶质地热仪的差异> +/- 20%。本研究表明以下内容:(1)尽管所有春季均为Cl型,但CPGF泉水中只有3台(共28台)地热仪预测的储层温度与BHT的平均值相似(统计上无显着差异)。 (2)CPGF和LHGF泉水和井水的化学特性不同可能是由于其储层岩性差异很大; (3)与部分平衡的水相比,来自CPGF和LHGF的非平衡泉水的溶质地热仪数量更多,可预测可靠的储层温度; (4)总的来说,与其他溶质地热仪相比,Na / K地热仪从两个地热场的泉水和井水预测到更可靠的储层温度; (5)用Na / K地热仪以外的方法预测储层温度不可靠可能是深层热水与地表水稀释/混合的结果; (6)与两个研究的地热田的泉水相比,更多的地温度计已预测井水可靠的储层温度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号