...
【24h】

Ultrasonographic soft markers for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis

机译:超声软标记检测rectosigmoid深部子宫内膜异位

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ABSTRACT Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ultrasound (US) soft markers as a first‐line imaging tool to raise suspicion of rectosigmoid (RS) involvement in women suspected of having deep endometriosis. Methods We included in this prospective observational study all patients with clinical suspicion of deep endometriosis who underwent diagnostic transvaginal US evaluation at our unit from January 2016 to February 2017. Several US soft markers were evaluated for prediction of RS involvement (presence of US signs of uterine adenomyosis, presence of an endometrioma, adhesion of the ovary to the uterus (reduced ovarian mobility), presence of ‘kissing ovaries’ (KO) and absence of the ‘sliding sign’), using as the gold standard expert US examination for the presence of RS endometriosis. Results Included were 333 patients with clinical suspicion of deep endometriosis. Of these, 106 had an US diagnosis of RS endometriosis by an expert. The only significant variables found in the prediction model were absence of the sliding sign (odds ratio (OR), 13.95; 95%?CI, 7.7–25.3), presence of KO (OR, 22.5; 95%?CI, 4.1–124.0) and the interaction between these two variables (OR, 0.03; 95%?CI, 0.004–0.28). Regarding their interaction, RS endometriosis was present when KO was absent and the sliding sign was present in 10% (19/190) of cases, when both KO and the sliding sign were present in 71.4% (5/7) of cases, when both KO and the sliding sign were absent in 60.8% (76/125) of cases and when KO was present and the sliding sign was absent in 54.5% (6/11) of cases. Thus, when the sliding sign was absent and/or KO was present, transvaginal US showed a specificity of 75% (95%?CI, 69–80%) and a sensitivity of 82% (95%?CI, 73–88%). Conclusions US findings of absence of the sliding sign and/or presence of KO in patients with clinical suspicion of endometriosis should raise suspicion of RS involvement and indicate referral for expert US examination, with a low rate of false‐negative diagnosis. Copyright ? 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
机译:本研究的目的是抽象的目标评价超声(美国)软标记的使用作为第一优先车道线成像工具提高猜疑女性rectosigmoid (RS)的参与疑似深子宫内膜异位。我们包含在这个前瞻性观察研究所有患者临床怀疑深部子宫内膜异位症进行了诊断经阴道的评估我们的单位2016年1月至2017年2月。标记是RS的预测评估我们参与(存在子宫的迹象子宫腺肌症,子宫腺肌瘤的存在,卵巢子宫粘连(减少卵巢流动),出现卵巢接吻的(KO)和缺乏“滑动迹象”),使用黄金标准专家我们考试RS子宫内膜异位的存在。333例临床怀疑深吗子宫内膜异位症。RS子宫内膜异位的专家。重要的变量在预测(优势模型没有滑动迹象比(或),13.95;高文(黄金、22.5;这两个变量之间的相互作用(或0.03;互动,RS子宫内膜异位症KO时在场没有和滑动迹象出现在10%(19/190)的病例,当KO和滑动迹象出现在71.4% (5/7)情况下,当KO和滑动迹象没有在60.8%(76/125)的病例,当KO现在和滑动迹象是缺席的54.5%(6/11)的病例。没有和/或KO在场,经阴道的我们显示75%的特异性(95% ?82%的敏感性(95% ?结论我们发现没有滑动签署和/或患者KO的存在子宫内膜异位症的临床怀疑应该提高对RS参与和显示推荐的怀疑对于我们的专家检查,低的假阴性诊断。由约翰·威利出版,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号