首页> 外文期刊>Applied Animal Behaviour Science >Sucking and allosucking duration in farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus)
【24h】

Sucking and allosucking duration in farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus)

机译:养殖马鹿的吸食和同卵吸食持续时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sucking duration in ungulates does not only mean milk transfer, but is also associated with maternal care in general. It seems to be a reflection of offspring demand rather than solely milk transfer rate. Thus, the objective of this study was to discriminate between sucking and allosucking (i.e. sucking non-maternal hind) behaviour in red deer according to the sucking duration. We hypothesized that: (1) calves should suck longer from their mothers than allosuck from non-maternal hinds; (2) sucking duration of calves frequently nursed by a particular non-maternal hind should be longer than that of calves occasionally allonursed; (3) sucking duration should be longer for bouts including one calf than two or more calves sucking simultaneously; (4) male calves should suck and allosuck longer than female calves; and (5) primiparous hinds should nurse and allonurse longer than multiparous hinds. We observed sucking behaviour of 25 hinds and their 38 calves (from birth until the youngest calf reached one month of age) in two seasons. We recorded 1730 sucking bouts, of which 11.62% in the first season and 4.37% in the second season were non-filial. The duration of filial sucking was significantly longer than non-filial sucking. A large individual variance in the incidence of non-filial sucking in both the calves and hinds was found. Therefore, the non-filial hind-calf pairs were categorized in two clusters according to the frequency of nursing non-filial calves for one hind in relationship to all nursing events for this hind by a cluster analysis (PROC CLUSTER, SAS). We used a general linear mixed model, GLMM (PROC MIXED, SAS) to test the influence of hind relationship to the nursed calf (filial, frequently allosucking non-filial, or occasionally allosucking non-filial pair). Sucking duration of occasionally allosucking non-filial calves was only marginally different from that of filial calves. There was no difference between the two groups of non-filial calves. Multiple sucking bouts were shorter than those with one calf. Male calves sucked longer than female calves; however, the greatest difference was recorded between frequently allosucking non-filial pairs of both sexes. Frequently allosucking non-filial males sucked the longest and differently from occasionally allosucking non-filial males. Frequently allosucking non-filial females sucked the shortest and differently from filial calves of both sexes. It is more likely that allosucking seems to be more important for male rather than female calves. Therefore, it is concluded that allosucking calves differ in their sucking behaviour and two types of allosuckers (frequent and occasional) should be taken into account when analyzing allosuckling behaviour.
机译:有蹄类动物的吮吸持续时间不仅意味着要转移牛奶,而且通常还与产妇护理有关。这似乎反映了后代的需求,而不仅仅是牛奶的转移速度。因此,本研究的目的是根据吮吸持续时间来区分马鹿的吮吸和同种吮吸(即吮吸非母体后代)行为。我们假设:(1)犊牛从母亲那里吮吸的时间要比从非母亲后代身上吮吸的时间长; (2)经常由特定的非母体后代哺乳的小牛的吸吮时间应比偶尔变小的小牛的吸吮时间长; (3)包括一头小腿的小腿比二头或多头小腿同时吮吸的持续时间更长; (4)公犊牛的吮吸和同卵吸吮的时间要长于雌犊; (5)初产后代的哺乳和异位神经要比多产后代更长。我们观察到两个季节中有25只后代及其38只小牛(从出生到最小的小牛达到一个月大)的吮吸行为。我们记录了1730次吸吮回合,其中第一季为11.62%,第二季为4.37%。孝顺的持续时间明显长于非孝顺的持续时间。小腿和后肢的非孝性吸吮发生率均存在较大的个体差异。因此,通过聚类分析(PROC CLUSTER,SAS),根据一个后代的护理非孝小牛的发生频率与该后代的所有护理事件的关系,将非孝顺后小牛对分为两类。我们使用一般的线性混合模型GLMM(PROC MIXED,SAS)来检验后关系对哺乳小牛(孝顺,经常变态非孝对,或偶尔变态非孝对)的影响。偶发非孝犊的吮吸持续时间与孝犊的吮吸持续时间只有一点不同。两组非孝顺小牛之间没有差异。多次吮吸动作比一只小腿短。公犊牛的吮吸时间比雌犊牛长;然而,最大的差异被记录在经常同性别的非孝对之间。经常变态的非孝顺男性的吸吮时间最长,与偶尔变态的非孝顺男性的吮吸时间不同。经常变态的非孝顺女性吮吸的时间最短,与两性的孝顺牛不同。对于雄性犊牛而言,变态雌激素似乎比雌性犊牛更重要。因此,可以得出结论,同种异体犊牛的吮吸行为有所不同,在分析同种异体行为时,应考虑两种同种异体类动物(常见和偶发)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号