...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Animal Behaviour Science >'Do not choose as I do!' - Dogs avoid the food that is indicated by another dog's gaze in a two-object choice task
【24h】

'Do not choose as I do!' - Dogs avoid the food that is indicated by another dog's gaze in a two-object choice task

机译:“不要像我一样选择!” -狗在两对象选择任务中避免另一只狗的目光所指示的食物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Family dogs successfully follow human-given cues in a two-object choice test. However, whether this ability has any roots in dog-dog visual communication, has been seldom investigated. We designed a test where a video-projected, life-sized dog 'demonstrator' provided directional cues for the subjects by turning its head toward one of the two plates containing food. To avoid pseudo-replication, videos of 28 different dogs were recorded as 'demonstrators'. N = 60 subjects were tested with a larger, smaller, or equally sized 'demonstrator', using a momentary head-and-gaze turn, while N = 15 subjects were tested using sustained demonstrative cues. Social status of the subjects, based on a questionnaire (single-kept, dominant or subordinate), was also taken into account. Our results showed that dogs did not choose between the plates by relying on the momentary head turns of the projected demonstrator (p = 0.35). Social rank did not have any effect on their choices either, however, 'single' dogs showed a left-side preference in their choices (p = 0.03). In the case of momentary gazing, all dogs developed strong side bias depending on their first choices (p 0.001). However, when the projected demonstrator performed sustained gazing, subjects avoided the indicated plate (p = 0.027). This is the first study showing that dogs do not follow the head turn cues given by another dog, but rather avoid the food that the other dog gazes at. This finding gives support to the theory that good performance of dogs in case of human-given cues may not have a direct predecessor in dog-dog communication, but rather relies on dogs' specific attention to humans and/or the plentiful opportunity to associate human directional gestures with food reward during the ontogeny. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在两个对象的选择测试中,家犬成功地遵循了人类提供的线索。但是,这种能力是否根源于狗与狗之间的视觉交流,鲜有研究。我们设计了一个测试,通过视频投影,与实物大小一样的狗“演示程序”,将其头部转向装有食物的两个盘子之一,从而为受试者提供定向提示。为避免伪复制,将28条不同狗的视频录制为“演示者”。 N = 60名受试者通过瞬时的头和视线转向以更大,更小或相等大小的“演示者”进行了测试,而N = 15名受试者则通过持续的示范线索进行了测试。还考虑了基于调查表(单身,主导或下属)的受试者的社会地位。我们的结果表明,狗没有依靠投影演示器的瞬时头部转弯来选择板块(p = 0.35)。社会等级对他们的选择也没有任何影响,但是,“单只”狗在选择中表现出左侧偏爱(p = 0.03)。在瞬间凝视的情况下,所有狗都会根据自己的首选而产生强烈的侧偏(p <0.001)。但是,当投影演示者进行持续注视时,受试者避开了指示板(p = 0.027)。这是第一项研究,表明狗没有遵循另一只狗发出的转弯提示,而是避免另一只狗凝视着食物。这一发现为以下理论提供了支持:在人为提示的情况下,狗的良好表现可能不是狗与狗交流的直接前身,而是取决于狗对人的特殊关注和/或与人交往的丰富机会。在个体发育过程中,带有食物的定向手势会产生奖励。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号