...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurology: Official Journal of the American Academy of Neurology >Patient outcomes from symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after stroke thrombolysis.
【24h】

Patient outcomes from symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after stroke thrombolysis.

机译:从症状性颅内病人的结果出血卒中后溶栓。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) on outcome of thrombolysis-treated ischemic stroke patients, as additional to recognized prognosticators. METHODS: The study cohort included 985 ischemic stroke patients treated with IV thrombolysis at the Helsinki University Central Hospital (1995-2008). In a multivariable model adjusted for baseline stroke severity, age, onset-to-treatment time, baseline glucose, hyperdense cerebral artery sign, and early infarct signs on baseline imaging, and prior modified Rankin Scale (mRS), we calculated risk ratios (RRs) of patients with sICH (separately per Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke[SITS]-Monitoring Study, European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II [ECASS-II], and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NINDS] definitions) for poor 3-month outcome (mRS 3-6) and mortality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) evaluated impact of sICH on outcome. Internal cross-validation of the model was done with bootstrap statistics. RESULTS: The frequency of sICH was 2.1% (SITS), 7.0% (ECASS-II), and 9.4% (NINDS). RRs for poor and fatal outcome, respectively, were 1.7 and 4.8 (SITS), 1.6 and 3.8 (ECASS-II), and 1.6 and 3.4 (NINDS). In IDI analyses, sICH improved prediction model for 3-month mRS of 3-6 and 4-6, respectively, by 1.4% and 3.0% (SITS), 4.0% and 5.9% (ECASS-II), and 4.7% and 6.1% (NINDS). In case of 3-month mRS 5-6 and mortality, it was 6.1% and 5.3% (SITS), 11.3% and 9.3% (ECASS-II), and 10.3% and 8.0% (NINDS). ROC analysis revealed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with sICH have increased risk of poor and fatal outcome. Compared with recognized stroke prognosticators, contribution of sICH is smaller. Definition-wise, ECASS-II- and NINDS-based sICH contribute relatively more; ECASS-II has the largest contribution to worst outcomes.
机译:目的:评估症状的影响脑出血(西奇)的结果thrombolysis-treated缺血性中风患者额外的公认的预言家。方法:研究对象包括985缺血性中风患者静脉溶栓治疗赫尔辛基大学中央医院(1995 - 2008)。基线中风严重程度、年龄、onset-to-treatment时间、基线血糖高密度的脑动脉的迹象,和早期梗塞迹象在基线成像,和之前改良Rankin规模(女士),我们计算的风险比率(RRs)患者的西奇(分别/安全实施溶栓中风(坐)-监控研究中,欧洲人合作研究急性中风II [ECASS-II],国家神经疾病和研究所为贫困三个月中风(研究所)定义)结果夫人(3 - 6)和死亡率。和操作特征(ROC)曲线集成歧视改善(伊迪)评价西奇对结果的影响。模型的交叉验证完成引导数据。(研究所)。分别是1.7和4.8(坐),1.6分析,西奇改进预测模型三夫人的3 - 6和4 - 6分别为1.4%4.0%和5.9%和3.0%(坐),(ECASS-II)4.7%和6.1%(研究所)。和死亡率是6.1%和5.3%(坐),11.3%ROC分析发现类似的结果。结论:患者西奇都增加了贫穷和致命的结果的风险。识别中风预言家,贡献西奇是小。和NINDS-based西奇贡献相对多;对最差ECASS-II最大的贡献结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号