...
首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter?
【24h】

Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter?

机译:调查女性的异质性首选项乳腺癌筛查:风险沟通重要吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: The relative benefits and risks of screening programs for breast cancer have been extensively debated. Objectives: To quantify and investigate heterogeneity in women's preferences for the benefits and risks of a national breast screening program (NBSP) and to understand the effect of risk communication format on these preferences. Methods: An online discrete choice experiment survey was designed to elicit preferences from female members of the public for an NBSP described by three attributes (probability of detecting a cancer, risk of unnecessary follow-up, and out-of-pocket screening costs). Survey respondents were randomized to one of two surveys, presenting risk either as percentages only or as icon arrays and percentages. Respondents were required to choose between two hypothetical NBSPs or no screening in 11 choice sets generated using a Bayesian D-efficient design. The trade-offs women made were analyzed using heteroskedastic conditional logit and scale-adjusted latent class models. Results: A total of 1018 women completed the discrete choice experiment (percentages-only version = 507; icon arrays and percentages version = 511). The results of the heteroskedastic conditional logit model suggested that, on average, women were willing-to-accept 1.72 (confidence interval 1.47-1.97) pound additional unnecessary follow-ups and willing to-pay 79.17 pound (confidence interval 66.98- 91.35) for an additional cancer detected per 100 women screened. Latent class analysis indicated substantial heterogeneity in preferences with six latent classes and three scale classes providing the best fit. The risk communication format received was not a predictor of scale class or preference class membership. Conclusions: Most women were willing to trade-off the benefits and risks of screening, but decision makers seeking to improve uptake should consider the disparate needs of women when configuring services.
机译:背景:相对的益处和风险乳腺癌的筛查项目广泛的讨论。在女性的偏好异质性进行调查国家母乳的益处和风险检查项目(金融机构)和理解风险的影响在这些通信格式偏好。实验调查旨在引起从女性公众偏好一个由三个属性描述(概率检测癌症的风险不必要的后续,自掏腰包筛查成本)。随机分配到两个调查,提出风险数组和百分比只或图标百分比。两个假设盼或没有检查使用贝叶斯11选择集生成D-efficient设计。分析了使用heteroskedastic条件分对数和scale-adjusted潜在的类模型。结果:共有1018名女性完成了离散选择试验(percentages-onlyversion = 507;version = 511)。heteroskedastic条件logit模型建议,平均而言,女性愿意接受1.72英镑(置信区间1.47 - -1.97)额外的不必要的跟进和意愿支付79.17英镑(置信区间66.98 -91.35)额外的癌症检测到每100人女性筛选。异质性与六偏好潜在的类和三个规模类提供最合适的方法。收到并不是一个预测类或规模类成员的偏好。女性愿意权衡利益和筛查的风险,但决策者寻求提高吸收应该考虑的女性在配置服务的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号