首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. >Clinical efficacy of intravenous followed by oral azithromycin monotherapy in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. The Azithromycin Intravenous Clinical Trials Group.
【24h】

Clinical efficacy of intravenous followed by oral azithromycin monotherapy in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. The Azithromycin Intravenous Clinical Trials Group.

机译:社区后天性肺炎住院患者静脉注射阿奇霉素单药治疗的临床疗效。阿奇霉素静脉临床试验组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate intravenous (i.v.) azithromycin followed by oral azithromycin as a monotherapeutic regimen for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Two trials of i.v. azithromycin used as initial monotherapy in hospitalized CAP patients are summarized. Clinical efficacy is reported from an open-label randomized trial of azithromycin compared to cefuroxime with or without erythromycin. Bacteriologic and clinical efficacy results are also presented from a noncomparative trial of i.v. azithromycin that was designed to give additional clinical experience with a larger number of pathogens. Azithromycin was administered to 414 patients: 202 and 212 in the comparative and noncomparative trials, respectively. The comparator regimen was used as treatment for 201 patients; 105 were treated with cefuroxime alone and 96 were given cefuroxime plus erythromycin. In the comparative trial, clinical outcome data were available for 268 evaluable patients with confirmed CAP at the 10- to 14-day visit, with 106 (77%) of the azithromycin patients cured or improved and 97 (74%) of the comparator patients cured or improved. Mean i.v. treatment duration and mean total treatment duration (i.v. and oral) for the clinically evaluable patients were significantly (P < 0.05) shorter for the azithromycin group (3.6 days for the i.v. group and 8.6 days for the i.v. and oral group) than for the evaluable patients given cefuroxime plus erythromycin (4.0 days for the i.v. group and 10.3 days for the i.v. and oral group). The present comparative study demonstrates that initial therapy with i.v. azithromycin for hospitalized patients with CAP is associated with fewer side effects and is equal in efficacy to a 1993 American Thoracic Society-suggested regimen of cefuroxime plus erythromycin when the erythromycin is deemed necessary by clinicians.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估静脉(i.v.)阿奇霉素,然后口服阿奇霉素作为社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的单药治疗方案。 i.v.的两次审判总结了在住院CAP患者中用作初始单一疗法的阿奇霉素。据一项开放性的阿奇霉素随机对照试验与使用或不使用红霉素的头孢呋辛相比报道了临床疗效。 i.v.的非比较试验也提供了细菌学和临床功效结果。阿奇霉素旨在为更多的病原体提供更多的临床经验。在比较和非比较试验中,阿奇霉素分别治疗了414例患者:202例和212例。比较方案用于201例患者的治疗。 105例仅用头孢呋辛治疗,96例给予头孢呋辛加红霉素治疗。在比较试验中,有10至14天就诊的268例确诊CAP的可评估患者的临床结局数据,其中106例(77%)的阿奇霉素患者治愈或好转,97例(74%)的对照患者治愈或改善。均值临床可评估患者的治疗持续时间和平均总治疗持续时间(静脉和口服)显着(P <0.05)比阿奇霉素组(静脉注射组为3.6天,静脉注射和口服组为8.6天)短(P <0.05)接受头孢呋辛+红霉素治疗的患者(静脉注射组为4.0天,静脉注射和口服组为10.3天)。本比较研究表明,静脉内注射的初始治疗。当临床医生认为必要时,阿奇霉素对住院的CAP患者的副作用较小,且疗效与1993年美国胸科学会建议的头孢呋辛加红霉素方案相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号