...
首页> 外文期刊>Health services research: HSR >Effects of a standardized community health worker intervention on hospitalization among disadvantaged patients with multiple chronic conditions: A pooled analysis of three clinical trials
【24h】

Effects of a standardized community health worker intervention on hospitalization among disadvantaged patients with multiple chronic conditions: A pooled analysis of three clinical trials

机译:一个标准化的社区卫生工作者的影响干预在住院治疗中弱势群体与多个慢性病人条件:汇集分析三个临床试用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: To analyze the effects of a standardized community health worker (CHW) intervention on hospitalization. Data Sources/Study Setting: Pooled data from three randomized clinical trials (n = 1340) conducted between 2011 and 2016. Study Design: The trials in this pooled analysis were conducted across diseases and settings, with a common study design, intervention, and outcome measures. Participants were patients living in high-poverty regions of Philadelphia and were predominantly Medicaid insured. They were randomly assigned to receive usual care versus IMPaCT, an intervention in which CHWs provide tailored social support, health behavior coaching, connection with resources, and health system navigation. Trial one (n = 446) tested two weeks of IMPaCT among hospitalized general medical patients. Trial two (n = 302) tested six months of IMPaCT among outpatients at two academic primary care clinics. Trial three (n = 592) tested six months of IMPaCT among outpatients at academic, Veterans Affairs (VA), and Federally Qualified Health Center primary care practices. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: The primary outcome for this study was all-cause hospitalization, as measured by total number of hospital days per patient. Hospitalization data were collected from statewide or VA databases at 30 days postenrollment in Trial 1, twelve months postenrollment in Trial 2, and nine months postenrollment in Trial 3. Principal Findings: Over 9398 observed patient months, the total number of hospital days per patient in the intervention group was 66 percent of the total in the control group (849 days for 674 intervention patients vs 1258 days for 660 control patients, incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.66, P '.0001). This reduction was driven by fewer hospitalizations per patient (0.27 vs 0.34, P '.0001) and shorter mean length of stay (4.72 vs 5.57 days, P =.03). The intervention also decreased rates of hospitalization outside patients' primary health system (18.8 percent vs 34.8 percent, P =.0023). Conclusions: Data from three randomized clinical trials across multiple settings show that a standardized CHW intervention reduced total hospital days and hospitalizations outside the primary health system. This is the largest analysis of randomized trials to demonstrate reductions in hospitalization with a health system-based social intervention. ? 2020 The Authors. Health Services Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Health Research and Educational Trust.
机译:摘要目的:分析的影响标准化社区卫生工作者(化学加工)在住院治疗干预。从三个来源/研究:汇集数据随机临床试验(n = 1340)在2011年和2016年之间。在这个池进行了分析疾病和设置,共同研究设计、干预和结果的措施。参与者被病人生活在极端贫困费城地区为主医疗保险。接受常规治疗与影响,干预社区卫生工作者实施提供的社会支持,健康行为指导,联系的人资源和卫生系统导航。一个(n = 446)测试在两周的影响一般病人住院。(n = 302)中测试了6个月的影响门诊病人在两个学术初级保健诊所。试验三(n = 592)测试了六个月的影响在门诊病人中学术,退伍军人事务部(VA)和联邦合格的健康中心初级护理实践。收集和提取方法:主本研究的结果是所有原因住院治疗,以总数天每个病人的医院。收集从全州或VA数据库30天postenrollment在实验1中,12个月postenrollment试验2中,9个月postenrollment试验3。超过9398个观察病人月,总每个病人的住院天数干预组在总数的66%对照组(849天674年干预病人vs 1258天660控制的病人,发病率比(IRR) 0.66, P。)。减少是由更少的住院治疗每个病人(0.27 vs 0.34, P。)和短的平均住院时间(4.72 vs 5.57天,P = 03)。的干预也降低了利率住院病人的初级卫生之外系统(18.8%比34.8%,P = .0023)。结论:从三个随机临床数据试验表明,跨多个设置标准化的化学加工干预减少总医院外的天,住院初级卫生系统。分析随机试验证明减少住院医疗系统的社会干预。作者。威利期刊有限责任公司代表健康研究和教育的信任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号