...
【24h】

The effect of platelet-rich plasma on clinical outcomes in lateral epicondylitis

机译:富含血小板血浆在临床的效果结果在肱骨外上髁炎

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose To evaluate the evidence for application of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in lateral epicondylitis. Methods We carried out a systematic review of the current evidence on the effects of PRP in lateral epicondylitis on clinical outcomes. We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Embase databases using various combinations of the commercial names of each PRP preparation and "lateral epicondylitis" (with its associated terms), looking specifically at human studies. Data validity was assessed and collected on clinical outcome. Results Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 5 were randomized controlled trials. Two cohort studies showed that PRP improved clinical satisfaction scores. One case-control study showed that PRP yielded a significantly greater improvement in symptoms compared with bupivacaine. Two randomized controlled trials compared the effect of injections of PRP and blood. Only 1 of the studies noted a significant difference at the 6-week time point. Three randomized controlled trials compared corticosteroids with PRP. Two of the smaller trials, which had follow-up periods of 6 weeks and 3 months, showed no significant difference between treatment groups. The largest randomized controlled trial found that PRP had significant benefit compared with corticosteroids with regard to pain and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores at 1- and 2-year time points. Conclusions This review highlights the limited but evolving evidence for the use of PRP in lateral epicondylitis; however, further research is required to understand the concentration and preparation that facilitate the best clinical outcome. Characterizing the timing of the intervention would optimize the health economics behind the decision to treat for the patient and health care provider. Level of Evidence Level III, systematic review of Level I to III studies.
机译:目的评估应用程序的证据富含血小板血浆(PRP)侧上髁炎。系统回顾当前的证据PRP在肱骨外上髁炎的影响临床结果。搜索PubMed的Medline,科克伦,CINAHL(累积指数护理和盟军的健康使用各种文学)和Embase数据库每个PRP的商业名称的组合准备和“肱骨外上髁炎”(与它相关条款),专门考察人类研究。临床结果。入选标准,其中5个是随机的对照试验。PRP改善临床满意度。病例对照研究表明,PRP产生了明显更大的改善症状相比之下,bupivacaine。对照试验的效果进行比较PRP和血液的注入。研究指出一个显著差异六周时间点。糖皮质激素与PRP相比试验。较小的试验,后续阶段6周和3个月,没有意义治疗组之间的区别。随机对照试验发现,PRP重要的好处相比,糖皮质激素对于疼痛和残疾的手臂,肩膀和手得分在1 - 2年时间点。但进化证据有限PRP的使用在肱骨外上髁炎;研究需要了解促进浓度和准备最好的临床结果。的干预将优化健康决定对背后的经济学病人和卫生保健提供者。证据III级,系统回顾我的水平三世的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号