首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >Trends in door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
【24h】

Trends in door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

机译:door-to-balloon时间和死亡率的趋势st段抬高心肌梗死患者主要接受经皮冠状动脉干预。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, current guidelines for reperfusion therapy recommend a door-to-balloon (DTB) time of less than 90 minutes. Considerable effort has focused on reducing DTB time with the assumption that a reduction in DTB time translates into a significant reduction in mortality; however, the clinical impact of this effort has not been evaluated. Therefore, our objective was to determine whether a decline in DTB time in patients with STEMI was associated with an improvement in clinical outcomes. METHODS: We assessed the yearly trend in DTB time for 8771 patients with STEMI who were undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention from 2003 to 2008 as part of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium and correlated it with trends in in-hospital mortality. Patients were stratified according to risk of death using a mortality model to evaluate whether patient risk factors affect the relationship between DTB time and mortality. RESULTS: Median DTB time decreased each year from 113 minutes in 2003 to 76 minutes in 2008 (P < .001), and the percentage of patients who were revascularized with a DTB time of less than 90 minutes increased from 28.5% in 2003 to 67.2% in 2008 (P < .001). In-hospital mortality remained unchanged at 4.10% in 2003, 4.02% in 2004, 4.40% in 2005, 4.42% in 2006, 4.73% in 2007, and 3.62% in 2008 (P = .69). After the differences in baseline characteristics were adjusted for, there was no difference in the standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) across the study period (SMR, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.26 in 2003 compared with SMR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.13 in 2008). CONCLUSIONS: There has been a dramatic reduction in median DTB time and increased compliance with the related national guideline. Despite these improvements, in-hospital mortality was unchanged over the study period. Our results suggest that a successful implementation of efforts to reduce DTB time has not resulted in the expected survival benefit.
机译:背景:急性st段抬高患者心肌梗死接受肝素)经皮冠状动脉介入,电流再灌注治疗指南推荐door-to-balloon(防晒霜)不到90分钟。减少DTB时间的假设减少DTB转化为时间在死亡率显著降低;这项工作没有的临床影响评估。确定一个防晒霜在下降STEMI患者与一个有关改善临床结果。在8771年的防晒霜时间评估年度趋势STEMI患者接受主经皮冠状动脉介入从2003年2008年,蓝十字蓝盾公司的一部分密歇根心血管协会和相关的它与住院死亡率的趋势。根据死亡的风险分层使用吗评估病人是否死亡模型风险因素之间影响关系的防晒霜时间和死亡率。减少每年从2003年的113分钟76分钟2008年(P <措施)和百分比的患者将近用防晒霜从28.5%上升时间不超过90分钟在2008年到2003年的67.2% (P <措施)。2003年死亡率仍维持在4.10%,2005年4.02%,2004年4.40%,2006年4.42%,2007年的4.73%和2008年的3.62% (P = i)。基线特征的差异调整的,没有差别标准化死亡率死因特异性)研究期间(,1.00;(CI), 2003年的0.74 - -1.26相比,0.95;2008年95% CI, 0.77 - -1.13)。了戏剧性的减少值的防晒霜吗和增加符合相关国家的指导方针。住院死亡率不变的研究期间。努力减少的成功实现防晒霜的时候并没有导致预期的生存受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号