【24h】

Allograft Reconstruction for Glenoid Bone Loss in Glenohumeral Instability: A Systematic Review

机译:同种异体移植物重建关节窝的骨质流失的盂肱不稳定:系统回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes and radiological outcomes after osteochondral allograft reconstruction for glenoid bone loss. Methods: Glenoid bone loss can occur in the setting of recurrent glenohumeral instability and poses a challenge for surgeons. Reconstruction of these defects with allografts has been proposed as an alternative to both arthroscopic stabilization and nonanatomic bony augmentation procedures with autografts. We conducted a systematic review of the literature for studies of any level of evidence that reported clinical or radiological outcomes (or both) after allograft reconstruction for glenoid deficiency in the setting of recurrent shoulder instability. Data collected included study and patient characteristics, surgical technique, outcome scores, range of motion, strength, subjective outcomes, radiological outcomes, and complications. Data from studies with a sample size of at least 5 were pooled in the main analysis. Studies were assessed for the presence of methodological bias. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Three studies were deemed eligible for pooled analysis. The study group consisted of 70 shoulders with a mean age of 27.7 years (74.6% of participants were men) and a mean follow-up period of 44.5 +/- 17.7 (range, 32 to 90) months. The mean final Rowe score was 90.6, representing a mean improvement of 57.5. Only 9.8% of patients complained of persistent or unimproved pain, and 93.4% were satisfied. Bony integration of the allograft was documented in 100% of shoulders. Recurrence of glenohumeral dislocation and overall instability were seen in 2.9% and 7.1% of cases, respectively. Conclusions: The current body of Level IV data suggests that allograft reconstruction for glenoid bone loss provides excellent clinical outcomes, low rates of recurrent instability, and high osseous incorporation rates with no evidence of graft resorption.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估临床结果和放射学结果骨软骨同种异体移植物重建的关节窝的骨质流失。发生在盂肱复发的设置不稳定和对外科医生提出了一个挑战。与移植重建这些缺陷已被建议作为一个替代关节镜稳定和nonanatomic骨增加程序与缺损。的文献进行了系统回顾证据表明,任何水平的研究临床和放射学结果(或报道)在同种异体移植物重建关节窝缺乏经常性的设置的肩膀不稳定。病人特点、手术技术、结果分数,运动范围、力量、主观的结果,放射学结果,并发症。大小至少5都集中在主分析。方法论的偏见。符合入选标准中审查。汇总分析。70的肩膀,平均年龄为27.7岁(74.6%)的参与者是男性)和平均随访段44.5 + / - 17.7(范围,32到90)个月。最后罗得分的平均值为90.6,表示平均提高57.5。抱怨持续的或未被利用的疼痛93.4%的人满意。同种异体移植物被记录在100%的肩膀。盂肱错位的复发整体不稳定的2.9%和7.1%情况下,分别。IV级的数据表明,同种异体移植物重建关节窝的骨质疏松提供优秀的临床结果,低利率复发性不稳定,和高骨的掺入率没有贪污的证据吸收。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号