...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >The effect of a structured behavioral intervention on poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

The effect of a structured behavioral intervention on poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.

机译:一个结构化的行为干预的效果糖尿病控制不佳:随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although maintaining nearly normal glycemia delays onset and slows progression of diabetes complications, many patients with diabetes and their physicians struggle to achieve glycemic targets. The best methods to support patients as they follow diabetes prescriptions and recommendations are unclear. METHODS: To test the efficacy of a behavioral diabetes intervention in improving glycemia in long-duration, poorly controlled diabetes, we randomized 222 adults with diabetes (49% type 1) (mean [SD] age, 53 [12] years; mean [SD] disease duration 18 [12] years; mean [SD] hemoglobin A(1c) [HbA(1c)] concentration, 9.0% [1.1%]) to attend (1) a 5-session manual-based, educator-led structured group intervention with cognitive behavioral strategies (structured behavioral arm); (2) an educator-led attention control group education program (group attention control); or (3) unlimited individual nurse and dietitian education sessions for 6 months (individual control). Outcomes were baseline and 3-, 6-, and 12-month postintervention HbA(1c) levels (primary) and frequency of diabetes self-care, 3-day pedometer readings, 24-hour diet recalls, average number of glucose checks, physical fitness, depression, coping style, self-efficacy, and quality of life (secondary). RESULTS: Linear mixed modeling found that all groups showed improved HbA(1c) levels (P < .001). However, the structured behavioral arm showed greater improvements than the group and individual control arms (3-month HbA(1c) concentration changes: -0.8% vs -0.4% and -0.4%, respectively (P = .04 for group x time interaction). Furthermore, participants with type 2 disease showed greater improvement than those with type 1 (P = .04 for type of diabetes x time interaction). Quality of life, glucose monitoring, and frequency of diabetes self-care did not differ by intervention over time. CONCLUSIONS: A structured, cognitive behavioral program is more effective than 2 control interventions in improving glycemia in adults with long-duration diabetes. Educators can successfully use modified psychological and behavioral strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT000142922.
机译:背景:虽然保持接近正常血糖延迟发病和放缓的进展糖尿病并发症,许多患者糖尿病和医生难以实现血糖的目标。病人因为他们遵循糖尿病处方和建议尚不清楚。行为糖尿病的功效干预在改善血糖长期糖尿病控制不佳,我们1型随机222成人糖尿病患者(49%)(平均年龄(SD), 53[12]年;18[12]年持续时间;(1 c) (HbA (1 c))浓度,9.0% [1.1%])参加(1)5-session manual-based educator-led结构化团体干预与认知行为策略(结构化的行为手臂);教育项目(集团注意控制);(3)无限的个别护士和营养师教育课程为6个月(个人控制)。12个月postintervention HbA (1 c)水平(初级)和频率的糖尿病自我照顾,为期3天的计步器读数,24小时饮食回忆说,平均数量的葡萄糖检查,身体健身、抑郁、应对风格、自我效能感和生活质量(二级)。混合的建模发现所有组显示改进的HbA (1 c)水平(P <措施)。结构化行为手臂显示更大提高团队和个人控制臂(3个月HbA (1 c)浓度变化:-0.8% vs -0.4%和-0.4%,分别(P = .04点组x次交互)。此外,参与者2型疾病比1型显示更大的改进(P = x .04点类型的糖尿病交互)。监视和糖尿病自我照顾的频率没有不同的干预。结论:一个结构化的认知行为程序比2更有效的控制成人干预在改善血糖长期糖尿病患者。成功地使用心理和修改行为策略。clinicaltrials . gov Identifier: NCT000142922。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号