...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >A Proficiency-Based Progression Training Curriculum Coupled With a Model Simulator Results in the Acquisition of a Superior Arthroscopic Bankart Skill Set
【24h】

A Proficiency-Based Progression Training Curriculum Coupled With a Model Simulator Results in the Acquisition of a Superior Arthroscopic Bankart Skill Set

机译:Proficiency-Based发展培训课程结合模型模拟结果在收购一个优越的关节镜板卡特的技能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of proficiency-based progression (PBP) training using simulation both compared with the same training without proficiency requirements and compared with a traditional resident course for learning to perform an arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR). Methods: In a prospective, randomized, blinded study, 44 postgraduate year 4 or 5 orthopaedic residents from 21 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved US orthopaedic residency programs were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 skills training protocols for learning to perform an ABR: group A, traditional (routine Arthroscopy Association of North America Resident Course) (control, n = 14); group B, simulator (modified curriculum adding a shoulder model simulator) (n = 14); or group C, PBP (PBP plus the simulator) (n = 16). At the completion of training, all subjects performed a 3 suture anchor ABR on a cadaveric shoulder, which was videotaped and scored in blinded fashion with the use of previously validated metrics. Results: The PBP-trained group (group C) made 56% fewer objectively assessed errors than the traditionally trained group (group A) (P=.011) and 41% fewer than group B (P =.049) (both comparisons were statistically significant). The proficiency benchmark was achieved on the final repair by 68.7% of participants in group C compared with 36.7% in group B and 28.6% in group A. When compared with group A, group B participants were 1.4 times, group C participants were 5.5 times, and group C-PBP participants (who met all intermediate proficiency benchmarks) were 7.5 times as likely to achieve the final proficiency benchmark. Conclusions: A PBP training curriculum and protocol coupled with the use of a shoulder model simulator and previously validated metrics produces a superior arthroscopic Bankart skill set when compared with traditional and simulator-enhanced training methods. Clinical Relevance: Surgical training combining PBP and a simulator is efficient and effective. Patient safety could be improved if surgical trainees participated in PBP training using a simulator before treating surgical patients.
机译:目的:确定的有效性proficiency-based进展(PBP)培训使用仿真都与相同的没有能力需求和培训相比之下,传统的居民课程学习如何执行一个关节镜板卡特修复(ABR)。随机、盲法研究中,44个研究生4年或5骨科居民来自21个认证委员会医学日本文部省毕业我们被随机骨科实习项目分配给1的3技能培训协议学习执行ABR: A组,传统(常规关节镜协会北美居民课程)(控制,n = 14);模拟器(修改课程添加一个肩膀模型模拟器)(n = 14);加上模拟器)(n = 16)。的训练,所有科目执行3缝合锚在尸体的肩膀上,这是录像和在盲评使用之前验证指标。PBP-trained组(C组)减少了56%客观地评估错误比传统培训组(A组)(P = .011)和41%少于B组(P = .049)(两种比较有统计学意义)。水平基准上完成最后的68.7%的参与者在C组修复B组则为36.7%和28.6%A与A组相比,B组参与者的1.4倍,C组的参与者是5.5倍,和组C-PBP参与者(谁符合所有中级水平基准)7.5倍达到决赛水平基准。培训课程和协议加上使用肩模型模拟器和之前提供优质的验证指标关节镜板卡特技能相比传统和simulator-enhanced培训方法。结合PBP和高效和模拟器有效。外科实习生参与PBP培训治疗手术前使用模拟器病人。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号