...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >Preventing Pressure Ulcers in Long-term Care: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
【24h】

Preventing Pressure Ulcers in Long-term Care: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.

机译:在长期护理预防压疮:A成本效益分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers are common in many care settings, with adverse health outcomes and high treatment costs. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of evidence-based strategies to improve current prevention practice in long-term care facilities. METHODS: We used a validated Markov model to compare current prevention practice with the following 4 quality improvement strategies: (1) pressure redistribution mattresses for all residents, (2) oral nutritional supplements for high-risk residents with recent weight loss, (3) skin emollients for high-risk residents with dry skin, and (4) foam cleansing for high-risk residents requiring incontinence care. Primary outcomes included lifetime risk of stage 2 to 4 pressure ulcers, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and lifetime costs, calculated according to a single health care payer's perspective and expressed in 2009 Canadian dollars (CanDollars 1 = USDollars 0.84). RESULTS: Strategies cost on average Dollars 11.66 per resident per week. They reduced lifetime risk; the associated number needed to treat was 45 (strategy 1), 63 (strategy 4), 158 (strategy 3), and 333 (strategy 2). Strategy 1 and 4 minimally improved QALYs and reduced the mean lifetime cost by Dollars 115 and Dollars 179 per resident, respectively. The cost per QALY gained was approximately Dollars 78 000 for strategy 3 and Dollars 7.8 million for strategy 2. If decision makers are willing to pay up to Dollars 50 000 for 1 QALY gained, the probability that improving prevention is cost-effective is 94% (strategy 4), 82% (strategy 1), 43% (strategy 3), and 1% (strategy 2). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and economic evidence supports pressure redistribution mattresses for all long-term care residents. Improving prevention with perineal foam cleansers and dry skin emollients appears to be cost-effective, but firm conclusions are limited by the available clinical evidence.
机译:背景:在许多压力溃疡是常见保健机构,与不良健康结果治疗费用高。成本效益的以证据为基础的战略改善当前的预防实践长期护理设施。马尔可夫模型来比较当前进行验证预防实践以下4质量改进策略:(1)压力所有居民再分配床垫,(2)高风险的口服营养补充剂居民与最近减肥,(3)皮肤对高风险的居民用干的皮肤润肤剂,和(4)泡沫清洗为高风险的居民要求失禁护理。包括生命周期阶段2到4压力的风险溃疡、质量调整寿命(提升)根据一个生命周期成本计算医疗付款人的角度和表达2009年加拿大元(1 = CanDollars USDollars0.84)。每居民每周11.66美元。一生的风险;治疗是45(策略1),63(4)策略,158(策略3),333(2)策略,策略1和4最低限度提高qaly和减少了意味着一生花费在179美元和115美元分别为每一个居民。获得000年大约是78美元策略3和780万美元策略2. 美元50 000 1 QALY上涨的概率提高预防是有效的94%(4)策略,82%(策略1),43%(策略3), 1%(策略2)。结论:临床和经济证据支持的压力重新分配所有长期护理床垫居民。泡沫洗面奶,干性皮肤润肤剂是划算的,但公司的结论受限于可用的临床证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号