...
首页> 外文期刊>Health Physics: Official Journal of the Health Physics Society >Electromagnetic field standards in Central and Eastern European countries: current state and stipulations for international harmonization.
【24h】

Electromagnetic field standards in Central and Eastern European countries: current state and stipulations for international harmonization.

机译:电磁场在中欧和标准东欧国家:当前状态和国际协调的规定。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Electromagnetic field standards in the West are based on well-established acute biological effects that could be considered as signaling a potentially adverse health effect. The specific absorption rate, which is proportional to the tissue heating (thermal effects), represents the basic restriction of exposure to Radio-Frequency (RF) fields. On the other hand, Eastern European standards are designed to protect from potential non-thermal effects that might be caused by chronic exposure to very low intensities, where a so-called "power load" (a product of field intensity and duration of exposure) represents the basic limitation. Thus, electromagnetic field standards in Eastern European countries differ considerably from those which are proposed by the International Commission of Non-ionizing Radiation Protection and the Standards Coordinating Committee 28 of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. In the present paper, the strategies for development of exposure limit values in electromagnetic fields standards currently in force in Eastern and Central European countries are discussed. Some differences as well as similarities of the national health and safety standards and the main obstacles to harmonization of these standards with those being established by Western national and international organizations and agencies are presented.
机译:电磁场在西方标准基于完善的急性生物这可能被认为是信号的影响潜在的不良健康效应。吸收速率,成正比组织加热(热的影响),代表了接触射频的基本限制(RF)领域。标准是为了保护从潜力非热能的可能造成的影响慢性接触强度很低,所谓的“电力负荷”(一个产品领域强度和持续时间的曝光)代表的基本限制。东欧国家的标准是不同的相当的提出的国际非电离委员会辐射防护标准研究所的协调委员会28日电气和电子工程师,公司。本文的战略发展在电磁场暴露极限的值目前在东部和标准中欧国家进行了讨论。的差异和相似之处国家卫生和安全标准和主要这些标准的协调障碍与那些被西方国家建立了国际组织和机构提出了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号