Comparison of three approaches to doxorubicin therapy: free doxorubicin, liposomal doxorubicin, and beta-glucuronidase-activated prodrug (HMR 1826).

摘要

BACKGROUND: Three approaches to doxorubicin therapy are directly compared: free doxorubicin, liposomal doxorubicin and beta-glucuronidase-activated prodrug (HMR 1826). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The optimal dose of HMR 1826 was determined to be 200 mg/kg once a week and subsequent studies were carried out comparing HMR 1826 at 200 mg/kg 1x/wk, liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) at 9 mg/kg 1x/wk and free doxorubicin at 7 mg/kg 1x/wk in seven different human tumor xenograft models. RESULTS: All three forms of doxorubicin inhibited tumor growth with similar efficacy in each of the tumor models with the exception of MDA-MB-231 tumor xenografts, which were resistant to free doxorubicin but sensitive to Doxil and HMR 1826. Overall less weight loss was observed with HMR 1826 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of HMR 1826 is equal to or better than that of doxorubicin and Doxil at a safe dose and schedule, indicating that the beta-glucuronidase activated prodrug approach is safe and effective.