...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >All-Cause Failure Rates Increase With Time Following Meniscal Repair Despite Favorable Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【24h】

All-Cause Failure Rates Increase With Time Following Meniscal Repair Despite Favorable Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:全因失败率随着时间增加半月板修复后尽管有利结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

? 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North AmericaPurpose: The purpose of this review is to perform a meta-analysis of studies reporting meniscus repair outcomes. Pooled analyses of such studies will provide an accurate estimate of the outcomes that can be expected following meniscal repair at various postoperative time points. Methods: A meta-analysis of meniscal repair failure (defined as persistent symptoms, lack of healing on magnetic resonance imaging or revision surgery) and other clinical outcomes was performed following meniscal repair. Patients included had traumatic, nondegenerative meniscal tears, were skeletally mature, and had specific time-points after surgery. Repairs included were performed either in isolation, or with concomitant ACL reconstruction. Because of the inherent heterogeneity of single-arm meta-analyses, pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Results: Rates of all-cause meniscal repair failure was pooled to be 12% at 0-1 years (95% CI:.09-.16), 15% at 2-3 years (95% CI:.11-.20), and 19% at 4-6 years (95% CI:.13-.24). Sensitivity analysis for studies performing meniscal repair entirely on patients with concomitant ACL reconstruction (ACLR) showed comparable rates of failure at similar time intervals. Development of osteoarthritis, in patients with knees previously free from articular pathologies, was 4% at 2-3 years (95% CI:.02-.07), and 10% at 4-6 years (95% CI:.03-.25). Conclusion: Meniscus repair for traumatic injuries have an all-cause failure rate that increases from 12% to 19% through a time period ranging from 1-6 years following surgery. The failure rates were comparable for patients with meniscal repairs performed with concomitant ACLRs. Level of Evidence: IV; Systematic Review of Level II-IV Studies.
机译:? AmericaPurpose:本综述的目的是执行一个荟萃分析的研究报告半月板修复的结果。的研究将提供一个准确的估计结果半月板后可以预期修复各种术后时间点。方法:一个荟萃分析的半月板修复失败(定义为持续症状,缺乏治疗在磁共振成像或修订手术)和其他临床结果半月板修复后执行。包括有创伤,nondegenerative半月板眼泪,只是成熟感,有特定的跨度为手术后。进行隔离,或伴随的ACL重建。固有的非均质性的随访时间荟萃分析,进行汇总分析使用一个随机模型。全因被合并半月板修复失败0 - 1岁12% (95% CI: .09点16),2 - 3 15%年(95%置信区间CI:厚.20),4 - 6岁(95%和19%置信区间:13。)。完全执行半月板修复患者随之而来的ACL重建(ACLR)显示在同样的时间可比的失败间隔。患者膝盖之前免费关节疾病,在2 - 3年(95% 4%置信区间:02 . 07),4 - 6岁(95%和10%置信区间:03年至今)。创伤性损伤全因失败率通过一段时间从12%增加到19%手术后1 - 6年不等。病人的失败率是可比的与半月板修复与伴随的执行ACLRs。II-IV研究的水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号