...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Soil Ecology >Effects of different site preparation methods on soil carbon and nutrient removal from Eastern beech regeneration sites in Turkey's Black Sea region
【24h】

Effects of different site preparation methods on soil carbon and nutrient removal from Eastern beech regeneration sites in Turkey's Black Sea region

机译:不同场地整备方法对土耳其黑海地区东部山毛榉更新地点土壤碳和养分去除的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In terms of wood production, eastern beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) is one of the most important Turkish tree species. The main forestry operation in the Black Sea region (BSR) is the harvesting of natural beech stands. These stands are naturally regenerated. A dense rhododendron (Rhododendron spp.) understorey prevents eastern beech (F. orientalis Lipsky) seed-tree regeneration in the Turkish BSR. Our study objective was to investigate the forest ecosystem effects of different woody vegetation control methods on forest floor organic matter (OM), soil organic carbon (SOC), soil physical and chemical properties and nutrients on beech regeneration sites in this region. In 2006, rhododendrons were cleared from treatment plots using hand labour by grubbing (GR), prescribed fire (PF), or machine preparation (MP) with a rake-equipped bulldozer. Untreated plots served as controls. The woody vegetation understorey, forest floor OM and mineral soil (0-20cm) were sampled, and their biomass, SOC and nutrient content were estimated for each treatment. While effective in preparing sites for beech regeneration, the MP treatment resulted in highly compacted soil (mean=1.5gcmpd) compared to the other treatments (1.1gcmpd). It also showed the largest ecosystem losses of C (45%), N (30%), and P (55%) from the forest floor and mineral soil (0-20cm). Furthermore, the MP treatment induced large ecosystem losses of soil K (72%) and Ca (58%). Both the GR and PF treatments increased soil pH and cation exchange capacity (CEC) relative to the controls, while their ecosystem C (25%) and N (22%) losses were moderate. In conclusion, the MP site preparation method removes more OM and soil nutrients, resulting in a lower soil CEC capacity compared to the other rhododendron control practices, including prescribed fire. Using heavy machinery during site preparation compacts the soil, increasing soil density to a level that may restrict plant growth. In contrast, grubbing and prescribed fire increase the soil pH and plant nutrient availability without compacting the soil. Therefore, these two methods should be promoted as effective and sustainable rhododendron control techniques for long-term productivity of eastern beech forests.
机译:在木材生产方面,东部山毛榉(Fagus Orientalis Lipsky)是土耳其最重要的树种之一。黑海地区(BSR)的主要林业业务是天然山毛榉林的采伐。这些林分是自然再生的。一层浓密的杜鹃花(Rhododendron spp。)下层阻止了土耳其BSR中东部山毛榉(F. Orientalis Lipsky)种子树的再生。我们的研究目的是调查该地区不同木本植物植被控制方法对森林地表有机质(OM),土壤有机碳(SOC),土壤理化性质和养分的养分的森林生态系统影响。在2006年,杜鹃花被人工处理,通过g(GR),处方火(PF)或配备耙子的推土机进行机器准备(MP)从处理区清除。未经处理的地块用作对照。对木质植被下层,林地OM和矿质土壤(0-20cm)进行采样,并估算每种处理的生物量,SOC和养分含量。 MP处理可以有效地准备山毛榉的再生,但与其他处理(1.1gcmpd)相比,土壤高度致密(平均= 1.5gcmpd)。它还显示出森林地层和矿质土壤(0-20厘米)中C(45%),N(30%)和P(55%)的最大生态系统损失。此外,MP处理导致土壤钾(72%)和钙(58%)的大量生态系统损失。相对于对照,GR和PF处理均增加了土壤pH和阳离子交换能力(CEC),而其生态系统的C(25%)和N(22%)损失则中等。总之,与其他杜鹃花控制措施(包括规定的火灾)相比,MP场地准备方法可去除更多的OM和土壤养分,从而降低土壤CEC容量。在整地过程中使用重型机械压实土壤,将土壤密度增加到可能限制植物生长的水平。相反,contrast草和开火会增加土壤的pH值和植物养分的利用率,而不会压实土壤。因此,应将这两种方法推广为有效和可持续的杜鹃花控制技术,以提高东部山毛榉森林的长期生产力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号