...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of hand surgery Asian-Pacific volume. >Is Antithrombotic Therapy Necessary Following Replantation of an Amputated Digit?
【24h】

Is Antithrombotic Therapy Necessary Following Replantation of an Amputated Digit?

机译:后抗凝治疗是必要的吗再植截肢的数字吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Antithrombotic therapy following replantation remains controversial, and the survival of replanted digits is affected by various other factors, such as the state of vascular damage and the surgeon’s level of skill. The present study’s aim is to obtain clinical evidence for postoperative antithrombotic therapy in replantation, with antithrombotic therapy being the only variable.Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study of patients who underwent replantation of a completely amputated digit by the same surgeon. The subject sample included 17 patients/19 digits (group A) in whom heparin and prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) were used postoperatively during a 1-year period, 19 patients/22 digits (group B) in whom heparin was not used postoperatively but PGE1 was used for a 1-year period, and 16 patients/19 digits (group C) in whom neither heparin not PGE1 were used postoperatively for a 1-year period.Results: Patient background and surgical procedure were not significantly different among groups, and only the postoperative use of heparin and/or PGE1 showed differences. Incidence of arterial occlusion, venous occlusion, or vascular spasm were not significantly different among groups (arterial occlusion: 1 digit in group A, 2 in group B, and two in group C, p = 1; venous occlusion: 1 digit in group A, 2 in group B, and three in group C, p = 0.67; vascular spasm: 1 digit in group A, 2 in group B, and one in group C, p = 1). Postoperative bleeding was significantly more common in the group using heparin (7 patients in group A, 0 in group B, and zero in group C, p < 0.001).Conclusions: These results suggest that heparin and PGE1 administration do not improve impaired blood flow following replantation. Considering the potential complications, heparin and PGE1 following replantation do not seem necessary.
机译:背景:抗凝治疗再植仍然是有争议的,重新种植位数影响的生存各种其他因素,如的状态血管损伤和外科医生的技能水平。本研究的目的是获得临床术后抗凝治疗的证据与抗凝治疗再植,的是唯一的变量。单中心回顾性研究的患者接受了再植的完全切除数字相同的外科医生。包括17名病人/ 19位数(A组)的人肝素和前列腺素E1 (PGE1)术后一年期间,19/ 22位患者(B组)在人肝素术后未使用但PGE1用于1年期间,和16个病人/ 19位数(集团C)在他没有肝素不PGE1术后1年时间。病人背景和外科手术组间的不明显不同,以及只有术后使用肝素和/或PGE1显示差异。闭塞、静脉阻塞或血管痉挛没有显著不同的组间吗(动脉闭塞:1位在A组,2B组,两组C、p = 1;阻塞:1位在A组,B组2,三个在C组,p = 0.67;数字在A组,2在B组,一个组C、p = 1)。术后出血更常见的组织使用肝素(7 A组患者,0 B组,和零在C组,p < 0.001)。结果表明,肝素和PGE1政府没有改善血流受损后再植。并发症,肝素和PGE1追随者再植似乎没有必要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号