...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, A. Space Physics: JGR >Comparison between the temperature measurements by TIMED/SABER and lidar in the midlatitude
【24h】

Comparison between the temperature measurements by TIMED/SABER and lidar in the midlatitude

机译:对比温度测量时间/军刀和激光雷达观测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Comparisons of monthly mean nighttime temperature profiles observed by the sodium lidar at Colorado State University and TIMED/SABER overpasses are made. In the altitude range from 85 km to about 100 km, the two observations are in very good agreement. Though within each other's error bars, important differences occur below 85 km in the entire year and above 100 km in the summer season. Possible reasons for these difference are high photon noise below 85 km in lidar observations and less than accurate assumptions in the concentration of important chemical species like oxygen (and its quenching rate) in the SABER retrieval above 100 km. However, the two techniques both show the two-level mesopause thermal structure, with the times of change from one level to the other in excellent agreement. Comparison indicates that the high-level (winter) mesopause altitudes are also in excellent agreement between the two observations, though some difference (2–3 km) may exist in the low-level (summer) mesopause altitudes between ground-based and satellite-borne data. In addition, the difference in local time dependency between lidar and SABER is investigated; this difference makes the comparison of mesopause altitudes difficult.
机译:每月平均夜间温度的比较资料观察钠激光雷达在科罗拉多州州立大学和定时/军刀立交桥制造的。100公里,两个观察是非常好协议。重要的差异发生在85公里以下在夏天全年超过100公里的季节。在激光雷达高光子噪声低于85公里观察和不到准确的假设在重要的化学物质的浓度物种像氧气(及其淬火速率)军刀检索超过100公里。两种技术都显示两级中气层顶热结构,随着时代的变化一个级别的其他优秀的协议。比较表明,高级(冬季)中气层顶海拔也非常好不过,两者之间的协议的观察可能存在一些差异(2 - 3公里)低级(夏天)中气层顶海拔之间地面和星载数据。此外,在当地时间依赖的区别激光雷达和军刀之间调查;差异比较中气层顶海拔困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号