...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Efficacy of prescribed grazing depends on timing intensity and frequency
【24h】

Efficacy of prescribed grazing depends on timing intensity and frequency

机译:规定放牧的有效性取决于时机强度和频率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

1. Exotic weeds and woody plants have invaded many grasslands, and prescribed grazing is one management technique used to combat these plants. Prescribed grazing entails introducing live_stock such as sheep or goats that eat unwanted plants. It sometimes has desirable effects, but incon_sistencies among study results discourage widespread use. Detailed studies that manipulate grazing timings, intensities and frequencies may explain inconsistencies among previous studies and identify effective weed control strategies. 2. We studied Euphorbia esula, an invasive forb avoided by cattle but eaten by sheep. We used simu_lated grazing (clipping) to estimate E. esula and resident plant responses to cattle and sheep grazing protocols. 3. Depending on timing, intensity and frequency, simulated grazing either: (i) did not dramatically affect the invader and/or resident species, (ii) increased the invader and decreased resident species or (iii) decreased the invader and increased resident species. These disparate results illustrate that successful prescribed grazing entails more than simply introducing animals that eat unwanted plants. 4. Our most promising finding was that removing small quantities of invader and resident species' biomass at early growth stages reduced the invader and increased resident species over time. Defoli_ating more intensively at later growth stages often gave the opposite response. Forage availability is lowest in spring, so a given landmass can be prescription grazed with fewer animals (or in less time) in spring compared with later in the year. 5. Synthesis and applications. Our study illustrates that responses to prescribed grazing depend heavily on the specifics of the grazing regime. Our results show that some grazing strategies have the potential to exacerbate weed problems, while other strategies help to control the invader and restore desired species. In the case of E. esula, very light prescribed grazing can be beneficial when con_ducted early in the growing season.
机译:1. 放牧是草地,规定管理技术用来对抗这些植物。规定需要引入live_stock吃草如绵羊或山羊吃的植物。有时有理想的效果,但是incon_sistencies研究结果之间的阻碍广泛使用。放牧时间、强度和频率解释先前的研究间的不一致性和识别有效的杂草控制策略。2. 避免牛但被羊吃掉。simu_lated放牧(剪切)估计E。牛和esula和居民植物响应羊放牧协议。强度和频率,模拟放牧: (i)没有显著影响入侵者和/或居民物种,(2)增加入侵者和居民物种或下降(3)减少入侵者和增加居民的物种。说明成功的规定放牧不仅仅需要引入的动物吃的植物。发现是,去除少量的入侵者,在早期居民物种的生物量增长阶段减少入侵者和增加随着时间的推移居民物种。集中在以后经常给增长阶段相反的反应。在春天,所以一个给定的大陆用更少的动物(或处方擦伤了更少的时间)在春季晚些时候的一年。说明反应规定放牧依赖于具体的放牧政权。策略有可能加剧杂草问题,而其他的策略来控制入侵者和恢复所需的物种。规定放牧大肠esula,很轻可以是有益的,当con_ducted早期生长季节。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号