首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Do polycultures promote win-wins or trade-offs in agricultural ecosystem services? A meta-analysis
【24h】

Do polycultures promote win-wins or trade-offs in agricultural ecosystem services? A meta-analysis

机译:polycultures促进双赢或取舍吗农业生态系统服务?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Agriculture comprises the largest global land use, makes it a leading cause of habitat loss. It is therefore critical to identify how to best construct agricultural systems that can simultaneously provide food and other ecosystem services. This challenge requires that we determine how to maximize win-win relationships and minimize trade-offs between services. Through meta-analysis, we tested whether within-field crop diversification (polyculture) can lead to win-win relationships between two ecosystem services: yield of a focal crop species and biocontrol of crop pests. We selected only studies that recorded both services (N=26 studies; 301 observations), allowing us to better determine the underlying mechanisms of our principal findings. We calculated log-response ratios for both ecosystem services in mono- and polycultures. We found win-win relationships between per-plant yield of the primary crop and biocontrol in polyculture systems that minimized intraspecific competition via substitutive planting. Additionally, we found beneficial effects on biocontrol with no difference in per-unit area yield of the primary crop in polyculture fields at high cropping densities (additive planting) where legumes were used as the secondary crop. These results suggest that there is a strong potential for win-win relationships between biocontrol and per-unit area yield under certain scenarios. Our findings were consistent across geographical regions and by type of primary crop. We did not find evidence that biocontrol had an effect on yield, but rather, both were independently affected by polycultural cropping.Synthesis and applications. We show that well-designed polycultures can produce win-win outcomes between per-plant, and potentially per-unit area, primary crop yield and biocontrol. Biocontrol services are consistently enhanced in polycultures, so polyculture management that focuses on yield optimization is likely to be the best strategy for maximizing both services. In doing so, we suggest that practitioners utilize polycultures that decrease plant-plant competition through a substitution of relatively large quantities of the primary crop for compatibly harvestable secondary crops. Additionally, if planting at high cropping densities, it is important that legumes be the secondary crop.
机译:农业由全球最大的土地使用,使其栖息地的丧失的主要原因。因此关键确定如何最好地构建农业系统同时提供食物和其他生态系统服务。决定如何最大化双赢的关系和最小化服务之间的权衡。荟萃分析,我们测试了是否within-field作物多样化(polyculture)会导致双赢的两个生态系统之间的关系服务:焦作物品种和产量农作物害虫的生物防治。研究记录了两个服务(N = 26研究;确定的潜在机制主要的发现。对生态系统服务在mono和比率polycultures。每棵植株的产量之间的主要作物生物防除polyculture系统最小化种内竞争通过代理的种植。对生物电控制的影响没有差异主要作物的单位面积产量在高种植密度polyculture字段(添加剂)种植豆类被用作二级作物。有一种强烈的双赢生物防除和单位之间的关系面积产量在一定的场景。是一致的跨地理区域和主要类型的作物。生物防治对收益率产生影响,但是相反,两人都是独立的影响polycultural裁剪。我们表明,设计良好的polycultures可以每棵植株之间产生双赢的结果,潜在的单位面积,主要作物产量和生物防除。在polycultures增强,所以polyculture管理侧重于产生优化可能是最大化的最佳策略两个服务。从业人员利用polycultures减少能辨出别竞争通过替换相对大量的主要作物为协调地收获的次要的作物。另外,如果种植在高种植密度,豆类是是很重要的次要的作物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号