...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Human-wildlife conflict, benefit sharing and the survival of lions in pastoralist community-based conservancies
【24h】

Human-wildlife conflict, benefit sharing and the survival of lions in pastoralist community-based conservancies

机译:Human-wildlife冲突、利益共享和狮子在牧区社区的生存保护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Like many wildlife populations across Africa, recent analyses indicate that African lions are declining rapidly outside of small fenced areas. Community conservancies - privately protected areas that engage community members in conservation - may potentially maintain wildlife populations in unfenced pastoralist regions, but their effectiveness in conserving large carnivores has been largely unknown until now. We identify drivers of lion survival in community conservancies within the Masai Mara ecosystem, Kenya, applying mark-recapture analyses to continuous sight-resight surveys. We use the number of livestock and human settlements as proxies for potential human-lion conflict whilst controlling for environmental variables and lion socioecology. Average lion densities within the Mara conservancies between 2008 and 2013 (1187 lions 100km(-2)) were 26 times higher than those previously reported in 2003. Survival rates varied amongst prides and were highest for lions utilizing central regions of conservancies. The number of livestock settlements (bomas [corrals] and manyattas) that were not members of a conservancy, and that fell within a pride home-range, had a large negative effect onfemale survival and was the most influential external predictor in models. These non-conservancy settlements accounted for 372% of total observed variation in survival, whereas conservancy settlements, which benefit financially from wildlife through their membership, had no effect on lion survival. Internal drivers of survival agreed with known ecology and social behaviour including age plus a negative effect of male takeovers on cub survival <6months. Vegetation cover, prey availability and the density of grazing livestock within a pride's range did not explain patterns in lion survival.Synthesis and applications. We show that lion densities have increased substantially within the Mara conservancies over the last decade and suggest that the creation of community conservancies has benefitted their survival. This suggests that lions can survive outside of fenced areas within pastoral regions if communities gain benefits from wildlife. We highlight the importance of expanding existing conservancies beyond their current geographical and political scope and forming buffer zones if wildlife ranges outside them. We suggest that changing attitudes to predators should be a key goal of community-based conservancies. Further work is recommended to identify what specific aspects of conservancy membership promote lion survival.
机译:像许多非洲野生动物,最近的分析表明,非洲狮子小防护领域以外的迅速下降。社区保护私人提供保护社区成员参与的区域保护——可能维持野生动物非隔离的地区的人口,但是他们在保护大效果直到现在食肉动物大多是未知的。确定司机狮子生存的社区在马赛马拉生态系统保护,肯尼亚,mark-recapture分析应用到连续sight-resight调查。牲畜和人类定居点同时代理潜在狮冲突控制环境变量和狮子socioecology。玛拉在2008年和2013年之间(1187保留地狮子是100公里(2))的26倍在2003年之前报道。多种多样的自豪和最高的狮子利用中部地区的保护。牲畜数量结算(围着栅栏(邀请)和manyattas)的成员保护,有自豪感活动范围,onfemale有很大负面影响生存和最具影响力的外部预测模型。定居点占总额的372%生存的变化,而保护定居点,经济上受益野生动物通过他们的会员,没有效果狮子生存。同意已知的生态和社会行为包括年龄+男性的负面影响收购幼仔存活率< 6个月。封面,猎物可用性和密度在骄傲的范围没有放牧牲畜狮子解释模式的生存。应用程序。在马拉大幅增加在过去的十年里,并建议保留地创建社区有保留地他们的生存受益。狮子能生存以外的防护区域内田园地区如果社区获得好处从野生动物。扩大现有的超出了他们的保留地当前的地理和政治范围和如果野生动物范围外形成缓冲区他们。捕食者应该以社区为基础的一个关键目标保护。确定什么特定方面的保护会员推广狮子生存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号