...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurology: Official Journal of the American Academy of Neurology >Why are stroke patients excluded from TPA therapy? An analysis of patient eligibility.
【24h】

Why are stroke patients excluded from TPA therapy? An analysis of patient eligibility.

机译:为什么中风患者排除在TPA治疗?分析病人的资格。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke (<3 hours) will not have a major impact on death and dependency unless it is accessible to more patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine why patients with ischemic stroke did not receive IV TPA and assess the availability of this therapy to patients with ischemic stroke. METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke were prospectively identified at a university teaching hospital between October 1996 and December 1999. Additional patients with ischemic stroke were identified that were admitted to one of three other hospitals in the Calgary region during the study period. The Oxford Community Stroke Programme Classification was used to record type and side of stroke. RESULTS: Of 2165 stroke patients presenting to the university hospital, 1168 (53.9%) were diagnosed with ischemic stroke, 31.8% with intracranial hemorrhage (intracerebral, subarachnoid, or subdural), and 13.9% with TIA. Delay in presentation to emergency department beyond 3 hours excluded 73.1% (854/1168). Major reasons for delay included uncertain time of onset (24.2%), patients waited to see if symptoms would improve (29%), delay caused by transfer from an outlying hospital (8.9%), and inaccessibility of treating hospital (5.7%). Twenty-seven percent of patients with ischemic stroke (314/1168) were admitted within 3 hours of sympton onset and of these 84 (26.7%) patients received IV TPA. The major reasons for exclusion in this group of patients (<3 hours) were mild stroke (13.1%), clinical improvement (18.2%), perceived protocol exclusions (13.6%), emergency department referral delay (8.9%), and significant comorbidity (8.3%). Of those patients who were considered too mild or were documented to have had significant improvement, 32% either remained dependent at hospital discharge or died during hospital admission. Throughout the region there was a total of 1806 ischemic stroke patients (admitted to all four Calgary hospitals). During this study period, 4.7% received IV TPA. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients are unable to receive TPA for acute ischemic stroke because they do no not reach the hospital soon enough. Of those patients presenting within 3 hours, 27% received the therapy but a further 31% were excluded because their symptoms were either considered too mild or were rapidly improving. Subsequently, a third of these patients were left either dependent or dead, bringing into question the initial decision not to treat.
机译:背景:溶栓治疗急性中风(< 3小时)不会对死亡产生重大影响和依赖,除非它是更多的访问病人。与缺血性中风没有收到IV TPA和评估可用性的疗法缺血性中风患者。连续的急性缺血性中风患者前瞻性地确定在大学吗1996年10月和之间的教学医院1999年12月。承认一个中风被确定其他三个医院在卡尔加里地区在研究期间。用于中风项目分类记录类型和中风。中风患者呈现的大学医院,1168(53.9%)诊断为与颅内缺血性中风,31.8%(颅内出血、蛛网膜下腔或硬膜下),并与TIA 13.9%。表示急诊科超出3小时排除73.1%(854/1168)。发病包括不确定的时间上的延迟(24.2%),病人等着看如果症状提高(29%)、延迟引起的转移从一个边远医院(8.9%),和无法理解的医院治疗(5.7%)。缺血性中风患者(314/1168)在3小时的大潮开始和承认这84个(26.7%)患者接受静脉TPA。主要原因排除在这个群患者(< 3小时)轻度中风(13.1%),临床改善(18.2%)、感知到的协议除外责任(13.6%)、应急部门推荐延迟(8.9%)和重大疾病(8.3%)。这些患者被认为是太温和的或记录有重要吗改善,32%仍依赖在医院出院或死亡入学。共有1806名缺血性中风患者(承认所有四个卡尔加里医院)。第四期,4.7%收到TPA。大多数病人无法接受TPA急性缺血性中风,因为他们没有很快就到达医院。在3小时内,27%的收到了治疗但被排除在外,因为进一步的31%他们的症状被认为过于温和的或迅速提高。这些病人或依赖死了,把质疑最初的决定不治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号