...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Trophic transfer of pesticides: The fine line between predator-prey regulation and pesticide-pest regulation
【24h】

Trophic transfer of pesticides: The fine line between predator-prey regulation and pesticide-pest regulation

机译:营养转移杀虫剂:细线捕食者-猎物之间的监管和pesticide-pest监管

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

1. Understanding pesticide impacts on populations of target/non-target species and communities is a challenge to applied ecology. When predators that otherwise regulate pest densities ingest prey contaminated with pesticides, this can suppress predator populations by secondary poisoning. It is, however, unknown how species relationships and protocols of treatments (e.g. anticoagulant rodenticide [AR]) interact to affect pest regulation. 2. To tackle this issue, we modelled a heuristic non-spatialized system including montane water voles, specialist vole predators (stoats, weasels) and a generalist predator (red fox) which consumes voles, mustelids and other prey. By carrying out a broad-range sensitivity analysis on poorly known toxicological parameters, we explored the impact of five farmer functional responses (defined by both AR quantity and threshold vole density above which AR spreading is prohibited) on predator- prey interactions, AR transfer across the trophic chain and population effects. 3. Spreading AR to maintain low vole densities suppressed mustelid and fox populations, leading to vole population dynamics being entirely regulated by AR use. Such vole-suppression treatment regimes inhibited predation ecosystem services and promoted pesticide dependence. 4. Keeping vole density below acceptable bounds by spreading AR while maintaining sufficient voles as prey resources led to less AR being applied and extended periods without AR in the environment, benefiting predators while avoiding episodes with high vole density. This may meet farm production interests while minimizing the impact on mustelid and fox populations and associated ecosystem processes. These alternating phases of mustelids and farmer regulation highlight the consequence of intraguild relationship where mustelids may rescue foxes from poisoning. Both global and wide-range sensitivity analysis illustrate the tightrope between predator-prey regulation and pesticide-pest regulation. 5. Synthesi
机译:1. 目标/目标鱼类和社区应用生态学的挑战。否则调节害虫密度摄取的猎物污染的农药,这可以抑制捕食者种群通过二次中毒。然而,未知物种的关系如何和协议的治疗(如抗凝剂灭鼠剂[阿拉伯文])交互影响害虫监管。包括启发式non-spatialized系统山区田鼠,田鼠专家捕食者(白鼬,鼬鼠)和一个多面手捕食者(红色福克斯)消耗田鼠、mustelids等的猎物。差分析已知的毒性参数,我们五个农民的影响进行了探讨功能性反应(定义为基于“增大化现实”技术的数量和阈值田鼠密度高于基于“增大化现实”技术传播禁止)在捕食者-猎物整个营养交互,基于“增大化现实”技术的转移链和人口的影响。保持低田鼠密度抑制mustelid人口和福克斯的人口,导致田鼠动力完全由基于“增大化现实”技术的使用。vole-suppression治疗方法抑制捕食生态系统服务和推广农药的依赖。通过传播基于“增大化现实”技术而低于可接受的界限保持足够的田鼠猎物资源导致更少的基于“增大化现实”技术的应用和扩展期没有基于“增大化现实”技术的环境中受益捕食者,同时避免高的田鼠密度。同时最小化mustelid和福克斯的影响数量和相关的生态系统过程。这些mustelids和农民的交替阶段监管强调的结果intraguild mustelids可能的关系狐狸从中毒解救出来。宽量程敏感性分析说明钢丝之间的捕食和监管pesticide-pest监管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号