首页> 外文期刊>Applied mathematics and computation >Comparison of reliability and the availability between four systems with warm standby components and standby switching failures
【24h】

Comparison of reliability and the availability between four systems with warm standby components and standby switching failures

机译:比较具有备用系统组件和备用切换故障的四个系统之间的可靠性和可用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Four different system configurations with warm standby components and standby switching failures are compared based on their reliability and availability. The time-to-repair and the time-to-failure for each of the primary and warm standby components are assumed to follow the negative exponential distribution. We develop the explicit expressions for the mean time-to-failure, MTTF, and the steady-state availability, A(T)(infinity), for four configurations. For all four configurations, comparisons are made for specific values of distribution parameters and of the cost of the components. The configurations are ranked based on MTTF, A(T)(infinity), and cost/benefit where benefit is either MTTF or A(T)(infinity). (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:根据它们的可靠性和可用性,比较了具有热备份组件和备用交换故障的四种不同的系统配置。假定每个主要组件和热备用组件的修复时间和故障时间都遵循负指数分布。我们为四种配置开发了平均故障时间MTTF和稳态可用性A(T)(infinity)的显式表达式。对于所有四种配置,将对分配参数的特定值和组件成本进行比较。根据MTTF,A(T)(无穷大)和成本/收益对配置进行排名,其中收益为MTTF或A(T)(无穷大)。 (c)2006 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号