...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurology: Official Journal of the American Academy of Neurology >Comparison and predictors of rash associated with 15 antiepileptic drugs.
【24h】

Comparison and predictors of rash associated with 15 antiepileptic drugs.

机译:比较和预测的皮疹15个抗癫痫药物。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors and relative incidence of antiepileptic drug (AED)-related rash in patients taking all common AEDs. METHODS: We reviewed 1,890 outpatients. Eighty-one variables were tested as potential predictors of rash. We compared the rate of rash attributed to each AED (AED rash) with the average rate of rash attributed to the other AEDs in all adults (aged > or =16 years; n = 1,649) when taking carbamazepine (CBZ), clobazam (CLB), felbamate (FBM), gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), primidone (PRM), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), vigabatrin (VGB), valproate (VPA), or zonisamide (ZNS). We repeated this analysis for patients with and without the identified nondrug predictors of AED rash. RESULTS: The average rate of AED rash was 2.8%. The only nondrug predictor significant in multivariate analysis was occurrence of another AED rash (odds ratio 3.1, 95% CI 1.8 to 5.1; p < 0.0001); the rate of rash in this subgroup was 8.8%, vs 1.7% in those without another AED rash. Higher AED rash rates were seen with PHT (5.9% overall, p = 0.0008; 25.0% in those with another AED rash, p = 0.001), LTG (4.8%, p = 0.00095; 14.4%, p = 0.025), and CBZ (3.7%, not significant; 16.5%, p = 0.01). Lower rates were seen with LEV (0.6% overall; p = 0.00042), GBP (0.3%, p = 0.00035), and VPA (0.7%, p = 0.01). Rash rates were also low (<1% overall) with FBM, PRM, TPM, and VGB (not significant). These AED differences remained similar in patients with and without other AED rashes. There were four cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome involving four AEDs. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of an antiepileptic drug (AED) rash is approximately five times greater in patients with another AED rash (8.8%) vs those without (1.7%). Rash rates were highest with phenytoin, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine and low (<1%) with several AEDs.
机译:目的:确定预测和相对的抗癫痫药物(AED) -相关的发病率皮疹患者采取所有常见aed。我们回顾了1890年门诊病人。测试作为潜在变量的预测因素皮疹。每个AED (AED皮疹)的平均利率皮疹归因于其他aed所有成年人(年龄>或= 16年;卡马西平(卡马西平)clobazam (CLB) felbamate(FBM),加巴喷丁(英镑)、拉莫三嗪(LTG),levetiracetam (LEV)、奥卡西平(光),苯巴比妥(PB)、苯妥英(PHT)、扑痫酮(人口、难民和移民事务局)tiagabine(板),托吡酯(TPM),氨己烯酸(VGB),丙戊酸钠(VPA),或zonisamide(硫化锌)。有和没有确定可循预测AED皮疹。AED的皮疹是2.8%。在多变量分析发生的另一个AED皮疹(优势比为3.1,95%可信区间1.8到5.1;在这组为8.8%,与1.7%没有另一个AED皮疹。被认为与PHT (5.9%, p = 0.0008;25.0%的人与另一个AED皮疹,p = 0.001),LTG (4.8%, p = 0.00095;卡马西平(3.7%,不重要;更低的利率被认为与列弗(0.6%;0.00042),英镑(0.3%,p = 0.00035),和VPA (0.7%,p = 0.01)。人口、难民和移民事务局,FBM TPM, VGB(不重要)。这些AED差异仍然是相似的患者和没有其他AED皮疹。史蒂文斯—约翰逊综合征4例涉及四个aed。抗癫痫药物(AED)皮疹大约是另一个患者AED大五倍皮疹(8.8%)和那些没有(1.7%)。拉莫三嗪与苯妥英最高,卡马西平和几个aed低(< 1%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号