...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. >Sex-Specific Management in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock A Substudy of the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial
【24h】

Sex-Specific Management in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock A Substudy of the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial

机译:性别管理急性患者心肌梗塞、心原性休克Substudy CULPRIT-SHOCK的审判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Women are more likely to suffer and die from cardiogenic shock (CS) as the most severe complication of acute myocardial infarction. Data concerning optimal management for women with CS are scarce. Aim of this study was to better define characteristics of women experiencing CS and to the influence of sex on different treatment strategies. METHODS: In the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial (The Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock), patients with CS complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to one of the following revascularization strategies: either percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit-lesion-only or immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Primary end point was composite of death from any cause or severe renal failure leading to renal replacement therapy within 30 days. We investigated sex-specific differences in general and according to the revascularization strategies. RESULTS: Among all 686 randomized patients included in the analysis, 24% were women. Women were older and had more often diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency, whereas they had less often history of previous acute myocardial infarction and smoking. After 30 days, the primary clinical end point was not significantly different between groups (56% women versus 49% men; odds ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 0.91-1.84]; P=0.15). There was no interaction between sex and coronary revascularization strategy regarding mortality and renal failure (P_interaction =0.11). The primary end point occurred in 56% of women treated by the culprit-lesion-only strategy versus 42% men, whereas 55% of women and 55% of men in the multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Although women presented with a different risk profile, mortality and renal replacement were similar to men. Sex did not influence mortality and renal failure according to the different coronary revascularization strategies. Based on these data, women and men presenting with CS complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease should not be treated differently. However, further randomized trials powered to address potential sex-specific differences in CS are still necessary. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01927549. VISUAL OVERVIEW: A visual overview is available for this article.
机译:背景:女性更容易患死于心原性休克(CS)为最急性心肌的严重并发症梗塞。女性与CS稀缺。是为了更好的定义特征的女性经历CS和性的影响不同的治疗策略。CULPRIT-SHOCK试验(罪魁祸首病变只PCI心原性休克和多血管PCI),CS复杂患者急性心肌梗塞和多支冠状动脉疾病被随机分配到一个后血管再生策略:经皮冠状动脉介入的culprit-lesion-only或直接多支经皮冠状动脉介入。点是死于任何原因或复合严重肾功能衰竭导致肾脏替代治疗后30天内。一般根据上的性别差异血管再生策略。在所有686名随机患者中分析,24%是女性。经常有糖尿病和肾脏不足,而较少之前的急性心肌梗塞的历史和吸烟。终点没有明显不同组(56%女性和49%男性;1.29 (95% CI, 0.91 - -1.84);之间的相互作用性和冠状动脉血管再生策略有关的死亡率和肾功能衰竭(P_interaction = 0.11)。主要终点发生在56%的女性culprit-lesion-only治疗的策略42%男性,而55%的女性和55%的男人多血管经皮冠状动脉干预组。面对不同的风险,死亡率和肾脏替代是相似的男人。根据不同的冠状动脉失败血管再生策略。与CS数据,男性和女性呈现急性心肌梗死和复杂化多血管冠心病不应该区别对待。试验驱动来解决潜在的性别CS的差异仍然是必要的。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;标识符:NCT01927549。视觉概述用于本文。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号