...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Vegetation Science >The effects of ground water discharge, mowing and eutrophication on fen vegetation evaluated over half a century
【24h】

The effects of ground water discharge, mowing and eutrophication on fen vegetation evaluated over half a century

机译:评估半个世纪以来地下水排放,割草和富营养化对on植被的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Questions: Were continued groundwater discharge and mowing regimes sufficient for vegetation preservation from 1944 to 1993? Which has a stronger effect on vegetation development; groundwater discharge or mowing? What is the role of surface water eutrophication as driver of vegetation change? Location: Het Hoi, The Netherlands (ca. 92 ha, 52° 13' N, 5°05' E). Methods: Hydrology was simulated for the late 1940s, early 1960s and 1987. Vegetation maps (1944, 1960, 1975 and 1993) were compared for biotope cover. Vegetation recordings in 1944 and 1987 were compared. Surface water quality was compared between 1950 and 1987. Which sites were mown was reconstructed from an interview. Effects of periodic mowing and groundwater discharge on vegetation development were tested for correlation. Results: Biotope diversity reduced significantly through decrease of semi-aquatic and tall-herb biotopes, and expansion of forest. The quagfen terrestrialization sere nearly disappeared from 1987 recordings, while thereed sere did well concerning abundance and species richness. Several typical (rich) fen species disappeared from recordings, while new species were mostly field margin species. Periodic mowing and discharge combined are correlated with increasing species numbers. The P-concentration in surface water increased while N-concentration decreased. Conclusions: Preservation of the reed sere was successful, whereas preservation of the quagfen sere was not. Periodic mowing and discharge stimulate species richness, discharge more so than periodic mowing. But slight eutrophication likely induced a shift from P-limitation to N-limitation, which stimulated the reed sere at the expense of the quagfen sere.
机译:问题:从1944年到1993年,持续的地下水排放和割草制度足以保护植被吗?对植被发育有更强的影响;地下水排放或割草?地表水富营养化对植被变化的驱动作用是什么?地点:荷兰Het Hoi(约92公顷,北纬52°13',东经5°05')。方法:模拟了1940年代末,1960年代初和1987年的水文状况。比较了植被图(1944、1960、1975和1993)的生物群落覆盖度。比较了1944年和1987年的植被记录。在1950年至1987年之间对地表水水质进行了比较。通过采访对哪些地点被割破进行了重建。测试了定期割草和地下水排放对植被发育的影响之间的相关性。结果:通过减少半水生和高药草生物群落以及扩大森林,生物群落多样性显着降低。 quagfen陆域化岩层从1987年的记录中几乎消失了,而那里的岩层在丰度和物种丰富度方面表现出色。几种典型的(丰富的)rich种从记录中消失了,而新种主要是田间边缘种。定期修剪和排放与物种数量增加相关。地表水中的P浓度增加而N浓度减少。结论:芦苇的保护是成功的,而夸格芬的保护却没有。定期割草和排放会刺激物种丰富度,比定期割草更容易排放。但是轻微的富营养化可能会导致P限向N限的转变,从而以牺牲quagfen的代价来刺激芦苇。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号