首页> 外文期刊>Injury prevention : >Evaluation of the efficacy of an intersection conflict warning system at two-way stop-controlled rural intersections: difference-in-differences and triple-difference analytical approaches
【24h】

Evaluation of the efficacy of an intersection conflict warning system at two-way stop-controlled rural intersections: difference-in-differences and triple-difference analytical approaches

机译:评价一个十字路口的功效在双向冲突预警系统中止农村十字路口:法和triple-difference分析方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective Intersection conflict warning systems (ICWSs) have been implemented at high-risk two-way stop-controlled intersections to prevent right-angle crashes and associated injuries. This study involved investigation of the impacts of ICWSs on crash reductions. Methods The study used a quasi-experimental design to analyse the potential causal relations between Minnesota's ICWSs and various crash rate outcomes (including total, injury, non-injury, targeted right-angle and non-right-angle crashes) in pre-post analyses. A restricted randomisation method enabled identification of three controls to each ICWS treatment intersection, and included as many comparable intersection characteristics as possible. Annual crash rates (per year per intersection) were analysed over the same periods before and after system activation for treatment and control intersections in each matched group. Pre-crash data for 3 years and post-crash data for up to 5 years were included, ranging from 2010 to 2018. Negative binomial regression models with generalised estimating equations were applied to estimate the average, immediate and continuing treatment effects of ICWSs, through the difference-in-differences and difference-in-difference-in-difference approaches, respectively. Results The ICWS treatment was significantly associated with a decreasing trend for targeted right-angle crash rates posttreatment. Although not statistically significant, most crash rate outcomes appeared to be elevated immediately after treatment (statistically significant for sideswipe crashes only). Pre-post differences in average crash rates (over entire periods), except for incapacitating injury-related crashes, were not statistically significant between treatment and control intersections. Conclusions The study provided important insight into potential causal associations between intersection safety countermeasures and crashes at high-risk rural two-way stop-controlled intersections.
机译:客观的交叉冲突预警系统(ICWSs)高危实现双向中止路口阻止直角崩溃和受伤有关。研究调查的影响ICWSs崩溃削减。准实验设计分析潜在的明尼苏达州的因果关系(包括ICWSs和各种崩溃率结果总、伤害、non-injury,针对性的直角在张后和non-right-angle崩溃)分析。启用三个控制的识别ICWS治疗交集,包括尽可能多的类似的相交特征可能的。十字路口)在同一时间进行分析治疗前后系统激活在每个匹配的组和控制十字路口。危机前3年的数据和事故后数据5年了,从2010年到2018年。广义估计方程用于估计平均,立即和继续通过ICWSs治疗的影响法和difference-in-difference-in-difference方法,分别。治疗显著相关下降趋势有针对性的直角崩溃利率后处理。有意义的是,大多数似乎崩溃率结果治疗后立即升高(统计上显著的擦边撞击事故只有)。利率(在整个时间内),除了失能伤害有关崩溃,没有治疗和之间的统计学意义控制十字路口。潜在的因果关系提供了重要的见解十字路口安全之间的联系对策和崩溃在高风险的农村双向中止十字路口。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号