首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >Comparison of transcritical CO2 refrigeration cycle with expander and throttling valve including/excluding internal heat exchanger: Exergy and energy points of view
【24h】

Comparison of transcritical CO2 refrigeration cycle with expander and throttling valve including/excluding internal heat exchanger: Exergy and energy points of view

机译:跨临界CO2制冷循环与带/不带内部热交换器的膨胀机和节流阀的比较:火用和能源观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The article compares four compression evaporative refrigeration cycles from energy and exergy points of view where carbon dioxide is considered as the working fluid. The four cycles are: (1) the cycle with expander, (2) the cycle with expander and internal heat exchanger, (3) the cycle with throttling and (4) the cycle with throttling and internal heat exchanger. In the cycles, effect of evaporation temperature and exhaust temperature of gas cooler on Coefficient of Performance (COP) and exergy efficiency are taken into consideration. From the energy and exergy points of view, the results indicate that using heat exchanger reduces COP and exergy efficiency of the cycle with expander while the use of heat exchanger in the cycle with throttling valve enhances the COP and exergy efficiency. The comparison between the four cycles reveals that the cycle with expander and without internal heat exchanger has the highest COP and exergy efficiency. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文从能量和火用角度比较了四个压缩蒸发式制冷循环,其中将二氧化碳视为工作流体。这四个循环是:(1)带膨胀机的循环,(2)带膨胀机和内部热交换器的循环,(3)带节流的循环,(4)带节流和内部热交换器的循环。在循环中,考虑了气体冷却器的蒸发温度和排气温度对性能系数(COP)和火用效率的影响。从能量和火用的角度来看,结果表明,使用热交换器时,使用膨胀器会降低循环利用率和能效,而在节流阀中使用热交换器时,会提高效率和利用效率。四个循环之间的比较表明,带膨胀器且不带内部热交换器的循环具有最高的COP和(火用)效率。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号