...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >Comparative performance study of an integrated air-cycle refrigeration and power generation system
【24h】

Comparative performance study of an integrated air-cycle refrigeration and power generation system

机译:空气循环制冷和发电一体化系统的比较性能研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study presents comparative energy and exergy analysis of an integrated air-cycle refrigeration and power generation system with four embodiments as developed in the literature. The energy and exergy efficiencies, energy and exergy inputs and outputs and major exergy destructions in the components are determined and compared for four embodiments. Parametric studies are also performed to observe the effects of different influential parameters namely: ambient temperature, mass flow rate and inlet air pressure of the air. The energy and exergy efficiencies of system 1 and system 2 are found to be 61.6% and 58.1%, and 64.3% and 60.7%, respectively. The energy and exergy efficiencies for system 3 are found to be the highest in the order of 74% and 68.5%, whereas for system 4 energy and exergy efficiencies are 64.8% and 61.2%, respectively. Moreover, system 3 produces the maximum net work done 4164 kW, whereas system 1 produces minimum net work done 2585 kW. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:该研究提出了具有文献中开发的四个实施例的集成的空气循环制冷和发电系统的比较能量和火用分析。对于四个实施例,确定并比较了部件中的能量和火用效率,能量和火用输入和输出以及主要的火用破坏。还进行了参数研究,以观察不同影响参数的影响,这些参数包括:环境温度,质量流率和空气的进气压力。发现系统1和系统2的能量效率和火用效率分别为61.6%和58.1%,以及64.3%和60.7%。发现系统3的能量和火用效率最高,分别为74%和68.5%,而系统4的能量和火用效率分别为64.8%和61.2%。此外,系统3产生的最大净功为4164 kW,而系统1产生的最小净功为2585 kW。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号