...
首页> 外文期刊>Healthcare Innovation >Who's Successfully Switching Into Downside Risk in the MSSP? A New Study Examines the Issue
【24h】

Who's Successfully Switching Into Downside Risk in the MSSP? A New Study Examines the Issue

机译:成功切换到下行风险是谁MSSP吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

"Despite most accountable care organizations (ACOs) in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) remaining in upside-only models, some ACOs have made the switch into risk-bearing tracks and/ or participated in risk-bearing Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) demonstration models such as Pioneer and Next Generation." And just which ACOs are successfully making that switch? "On average, track switchers tend to be larger, more experienced, and more successful on program financial metrics. The difference between switchers and others on financial metrics is not explained by benchmark levels or ACO size. Track switchers were also more likely to serve high-population and metropolitan areas."Those are the conclusions of a recent study by researchers at the Salt Lake City-based Leavitt Partners, who in February released a report on the subject entitled "Track Switching in Medicare ACO Programs: A Look at the Move to Downside Risk." That white paper is available via the Leavitt Partners website.
机译:“尽管最负责任的医疗机构(治疗)的医疗保险储蓄计划共享(MSSP)留在upside-only模型,一些治疗有开关到风险承担行为追踪了吗和/或参与中心的风险承担医疗保险和医疗补助创新(CMMI)演示模型,如先锋一代。”使开关吗?往往是更大的,更有经验,等等成功项目财务指标。转换器和其他人的区别财务指标并不是解释为基准水平或ACO大小。更有可能为高人口和服务大都市地区。最近的一项研究,研究人员盐湖城市莱维特的合作伙伴,在2月份发布了一份报告关于这个主题名为“轨道开关在医疗保险ACO程序:一看搬到下行风险。”可以通过莱维特伙伴网站。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号