...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Engineering in Agriculture >INCREASING STOCKING DENSITY REDUCES EMISSIONS OF FUGITIVE DUST FROM CATTLE FEEDYARDS
【24h】

INCREASING STOCKING DENSITY REDUCES EMISSIONS OF FUGITIVE DUST FROM CATTLE FEEDYARDS

机译:提高寻觅密度可减少牛场产生的逃逸粉尘排放

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The moisture and compaction dynamics of an open-lot corral surface in a cattle feedyard depend strongly on the spatial density at which the animals are stocked. Because the moisture content and bulk density of the corral surface directly influence its intrinsic dust susceptibility, emission of fugitive dust from a feedyard surface should be sensitive to changes in stocking density. In the summer of 2012 we measured airborne dust concentrations upwind and downwind of feedyard pens stocked at two different densities, 718 (control) and 1,435 hd ha(-1), over a 160-d feeding period. Doubled stocking density was achieved in two different ways, by (A) confining cattle to half the pen area using electric-cross fencing and (B) doubling the number of cattle in the pens. Path-averaged dust concentrations were measured upwind and downwind of feedyard pens using an optical particle sizer (OPS model 3330, TSI Inc., Shoreview, Minn) and an earlier-model optical sensor (model DUSTTRAK II 8530, TSI Inc., Shoreview, Minn.) mounted on mobile monitoring platforms. Because the monitoring platforms used different instruments, during the data analysis phase DUSTTRAK data were compared only to DUSTTRAK data, and OPS data were compared only to OPS data. Downwind 1-min concentrations of dust varied from 1 to 4,478 mu g m(-3) for the control pens, 1 to 2,431 mu g m(-3) for the pens with cross-fencing (treatment A), and 1 to 2,872 mu g m(-3) for the pens with twice as many cattle as the control pens (treatment B). Dispersion modeling using AERMOD revealed that the apparent dust-emission fluxes from treatments A and B were 79.4% and 80.6% lower, respectively, than the apparent emission flux from the control pens (23.45 mu g m(-2) s(-1) We conclude that stocking-density manipulation is likely to be a viable Beneficial Management Practice (BMP) for controlling fugitive dust from open-lot cattle feedyards but that improved, path-averaged monitoring techniques appropriate to the feedyard source geometry are needed.
机译:牲畜饲养场中露天畜栏表面的水分和压实动力学在很大程度上取决于饲养动物的空间密度。由于畜栏表面的水分含量和堆积密度直接影响其固有的粉尘敏感性,因此,从饲养场表面散发出的扬尘应对饲养密度的变化敏感。在2012年夏季,我们在160天的喂食期间测量了饲草笔以718(对照)和1,435 hd ha(-1)两种密度饲养时,上风和下风的空气尘埃浓度。通过两种不同方式实现了两倍的放养密度:(A)使用电交叉栅栏将牛限制在围栏面积的一半,以及(B)将围栏中的牛的数量增加一倍。使用光学粒度仪(OPS 3330型,TSI Inc.,Shoreview,明尼苏达州)和较早型号的光学传感器(DUSTTRAK II 8530型,TSI Inc.,Shoreview, Minn。)安装在移动监控平台上。由于监视平台使用不同的仪器,因此在数据分析阶段,仅将DUSTTRAK数据与DUSTTRAK数据进行比较,而将OPS数据仅与OPS数据进行比较。顺风的1分钟浓度的控制笔为1到4,478 mu gm(-3),交叉围栏的笔为1到2,431 mu gm(-3)(处理A),以及1到2,872 mu g (-3)牛的数量是对照牛的两倍(处理B)。使用AERMOD的分散模型显示,处理A和B的表观尘埃排放通量分别比对照笔的表观排放通量(23.45μgm(-2)s(-1)低79.4%和80.6%结论是,控制密度可能是一种可行的有益管理实践(BMP),用于控制露天牛饲养场中的扬尘,但是需要改进的,适合于饲养场源几何形状的路径平均监控技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号