...
【24h】

Efficacy of a surfactant-based wound dressing on biofilm control

机译:功效的surfactant-based伤口敷料生物膜控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of both a nonantimicrobial and antimicrobial (1% silver sulfadiazine—SSD) surfactant-based wound dressing in the control of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus sp, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) biofilms. Anti-biofihn efficacy was evaluated in numerous adapted American Standards for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard biofilm models and other bespoke biofilm models. The ASTM standard models employed included the Minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) biofilm model (ASTM E2799) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) biofilm reactor model (ASTM 2871). Such bespoke biofilm models included the filter biofilm model and the chamberslide biofilm model. Results showed complete kill of microorganisms within a biofilm using the antimicrobial surfactant-based wound dressing. Interestingly, the nonantimicrobial surfactant-based dressing could disrupt existing biofilms by causing biofilm detachment. Prior to biofilm detachment, we demonstrated, using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), the dispersive effect of the nonantimicrobial surfactant-based wound dressing on the biofilm within 10 minutes of treatment. Furthermore, the non-antimicrobial surfactant-based wound dressing caused an increase in microbial flocculation/aggregation, important for microbial concentration. In conclusion, this nonantimicrobial surfactant-based wound dressing leads to the effective detachment and dispersion of in vitro biofilms. The use of surfactant-based wound dressings in a clinical setting may help to disrupt existing biofilm from wound tissue and may increase the action of antimicrobial treatment.
机译:本研究的目的是评估疗效nonantimicrobial和抗菌素(1%银sulfadiazine-SSD) surfactant-based伤口穿假单胞菌的控制绿脓杆菌,肠球菌sp,葡萄球菌epidermidis、金黄色葡萄球菌耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)生物膜。在众多Anti-biofihn功效是评估适应美国的测试和标准生物膜模型和材料(ASTM)标准其他定制的生物膜模型。模型采用包括最低生物膜根除浓度(MBEC)生物膜模型(ASTM E2799)和疾病控制中心(CDC)生物膜反应器模型(ASTM 2871)。定制的生物膜模型包括过滤器生物膜模型和chamberslide生物膜模型。结果显示完全杀死微生物生物膜内使用抗菌素surfactant-based伤口敷料。的nonantimicrobial surfactant-based酱可能会破坏现有的生物膜,导致生物膜分离。我们证明,使用共焦激光扫描显微镜(样品形貌),色散效应的nonantimicrobial surfactant-based伤口敷料在10分钟内生物膜的治疗。此外,non-antimicrobialsurfactant-based伤口敷料的引起的增加微生物絮凝/聚合,重要的微生物浓度。结论,这nonantimicrobialsurfactant-based伤口敷料导致的有效的分离和体外的弥散生物膜。酱可能有助于在临床设置从伤口组织和破坏现有的生物膜可能会增加抗菌的作用治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号