首页> 外文期刊>Angle Orthodontist >Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces
【24h】

Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces

机译:对准器疗法和常规边缘支架的时间效率比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the time efficiency of aligner therapy (ALT) and conventional edgewise braces (CEB) based on large samples of patients treated by the same highly experienced orthodontist, with the same treatment goals for both groups of patients. Materials and Methods: The retrospective portion of the study evaluated 150 CEB patients who were matched, based on mandibular crowding and number of rotated teeth, to 150 ALT patients. All records were obtained at one orthodontist's office. All of the patients had mild-to-moderate Class I malocclusions (≤5 mm incisor crowding) and were treated nonextraction. Age, gender, total treatment time, total number of appointments, types of appointments, materials used, mandibular crowding, and number of rotated teeth were recorded from the patients' records. The prospective portion of the study timed the various types of appointments for both treatments with a stopwatch. Results: Compared to ALT, CEB required significantly (P<.01) more visits (approximately 4.0), a longer treatment duration (5.5 months), more emergency visits (1.0), greater emergency chair time (7.0 minutes), and greater total chair time (93.4 minutes). However, ALT showed significantly (P<.01) greater total material costs and required significantly more total doctor time than CEB (P<.01). Conclusions: Whether the greater time efficiency of ALT offsets the greater material costs and doctor time required depends on the experience of the orthodontist and the number of ALT case starts.
机译:目的:比较以相同经验丰富的正畸医生治疗的大量患者为基础的对准剂治疗(ALT)和常规边缘支架(CEB)的时间效率,两组患者的治疗目标相同。材料和方法:研究的回顾性部分根据下颌的拥挤程度和旋转的牙齿数量评估了150例CEB患者和150例ALT患者。所有记录都是在一个牙医诊所获得的。所有患者均患有轻度至中度的I类错牙合(门牙拥挤≤5mm),且未接受拔牙治疗。从患者的病历中记录了年龄,性别,总治疗时间,约会总数,约会类型,使用的材料,下颌骨拥挤以及牙齿旋转的数量。该研究的前瞻性部分使用秒表对两种治疗的各种约会进行了计时。结果:与ALT相比,CEB需要更多的访视(P <.01)(大约4.0),更长的治疗时间(5.5个月),更多的急诊(1.0),更长的急诊时间(7.0分钟)和更大的总数主持时间(93.4分钟)。但是,与CEB相比,ALT显示出明显更高的总材料成本(P <.01),并且所需的总医生时间也明显更长(P <.01)。结论:ALT的更高时间效率是否能抵消更大的材料成本和所需的医生时间,取决于正畸医生的经验和ALT病例数的开始。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号