首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural neurology >Ishizaki, J., Meguro, K., Nara, N., Kasai, M., Yamadori, A.Impaired shifting of visuospatial attention in Alzheimer's disease as shown by the covert orienting paradigm: Implications for visual construction disability
【24h】

Ishizaki, J., Meguro, K., Nara, N., Kasai, M., Yamadori, A.Impaired shifting of visuospatial attention in Alzheimer's disease as shown by the covert orienting paradigm: Implications for visual construction disability

机译:石崎J.,目黑K.,奈良N.,河西M.

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To investigate impaired shifting of visuospatial attention in Alzheimer's disease (AD) compared with age-matched controls. Method: An attention shifting was examined in 20 AD patients and 10 age-matched normal subjects by choice reaction time (CRT) and covert orienting paradigm. Visuospatial functions tests were also performed. For covert orienting, a peripheral spatial cue method was used, with stimulus-onset (SOA) between the cue and the target time varying from 250 to 2100 ms. Results: The CRT showed no difference between the AD and normal groups. However, the RTs costs plus benefits were greater in the AD than normal group for two SOA conditions independent of dementia severity. Individual profiles in the time course of cue validity revealed two AD subgroups, i.e., a normal pattern for the cue validity of time course, and an abnormal, 'extinction-like' pattern. The latter had a particular difficulty in performing visual construction and spatial attention. Conclusions: Focusing attention was relatively intact in AD. However, shifting of visuospatial attention was impaired in AD compared with normal controls. There was a subgroup whose deficits were not only in 'disengagement,' but their voluntary shifting of attention was affected. These subgroups may show clinically severe visuospatial symptoms in more advanced stage.
机译:目的:研究与年龄匹配的对照组相比,阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)的视觉空间注意力转移障碍。方法:通过选择反应时间(CRT)和隐蔽取向范例,对20名AD患者和10名年龄匹配的正常受试者进行了注意力转移。还进行了视觉空间功能测试。对于隐蔽定向,使用外围空间提示方法,提示和目标时间之间的刺激发作(SOA)在250到2100 ms之间变化。结果:CRT显示AD组和正常组之间无差异。但是,对于两种SOA状况,AD的RT成本加收益在AD中均比正常组要大,而与痴呆严重程度无关。提示有效性的时间过程中的个人资料显示了两个AD子组,即,提示时间过程的有效性的正常模式和异常的“消光样”模式。后者在执行视觉构造和空间注意力方面特别困难。结论:注意力集中在AD中相对完整。但是,与正常对照组相比,AD的视觉空间注意力转移受到了损害。有一个亚组的缺陷不仅在于“脱离接触”,而且他们的注意力转移也受到影响。这些亚组可能在更晚期阶段显示临床严重的视觉空间症状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号