首页> 外文期刊>Animal Biodiversity and Conservation >Connectivity patterns and key non-breeding areas of white-throated bluethroat (Luscinia svecica) European populations
【24h】

Connectivity patterns and key non-breeding areas of white-throated bluethroat (Luscinia svecica) European populations

机译:白喉蓝喉(Luscinia svecica)欧洲人口的连通性模式和主要非繁殖地区

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using ring recovery data from the EURING databank, the aims of this study were: (1) to identify the chief migration and wintering areas of white-throated bluethroat European subspecies, L. s. namnetum, L. s. cyanecula and L. s. azuricollis, (2) to evaluate the degree of connectivity between breeding and non-breeding regions and determine the migration patterns of each subspecies, and (3) to evaluate whether recovery data are sufficient to answer the previous questions adequately. Most of the recoveries were obtained during the autumn migration period (n = 155, 68.9%), followed by winter (n = 49, 21.8%) and spring (n = 21, 9.3%). For L. s. azuricollis, we did not find any ring recoveries at more than 100 km in autumn or spring, and there were none at all in winter. All analyses thus relate to L. s. cyanecula and L. s. namnetum. Both subspecies move across a NE SW axis from their breeding to their wintering areas within the circum-Mediterranean region, mainly in Iberia, following population-specific parallel migration routes. L. s. namnetum mainly uses the Atlantic coastal marshes from France to south-western Iberia, where the chief wintering areas are found. L. s. cyanecula, however, uses both Atlantic and Mediterranean wetlands in autumn, but only those in the Mediterranean in spring, thus giving rise to a loop-migration pattern. Telescopic migration was demonstrated for L. s. cyanecula. Recovery data were insufficient to identify in detail the entire wintering range for all white-throated bluethroat European populations. Technologies such as the use of geolocators will play a relevant role in this scenario.
机译:使用来自EURING数据库的环恢复数据,本研究的目的是:(1)确定白喉蓝喉欧洲亚种L. s的主要迁徙和越冬区域。南尼姆湖cyanecula和L. s。 azuricollis,(2)评估育种地区与非育种地区之间的连通程度,并确定每个亚种的迁移模式,(3)评估恢复数据是否足以充分回答上述问题。大部分的采收率是在秋季迁徙期获得的(n = 155,68.9%),其次是冬季(n = 49,21.8%)和春季(n = 21,9.3%)。对于L.满天星,我们在秋季或春季没有发现超过100 km的回环,而在冬天则完全没有。因此,所有分析都与L. s。有关。 cyanecula和L. s。楠木这两个亚种都沿着特定种群的平行迁移路线,从繁殖到整个地中海南部地区(主要是伊比利亚)的越冬地区,都沿NE SW轴移动。 L. namnetum主要利用从法国到伊比利亚西南部的大西洋沿海沼泽地,那里是主要的越冬地区。 L.但是,cyanecula在秋季使用大西洋和地中海湿地,但在春季仅使用地中海的湿地,因此产生了loop回迁移的格局。望远镜的迁移被证明为L. s。蓝藻。恢复数据不足以详细确定欧洲所有白喉蓝喉种群的整个越冬范围。在这种情况下,诸如使用地理定位器之类的技术将发挥重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号