...
首页> 外文期刊>Animal >Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment.
【24h】

Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment.

机译:使用生命周期评估法评估在猪和肉鸡饲料中掺入饲料用氨基酸对环境的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The incorporation of feed-use (FU) amino acids (AAs) in diets results in a reduced use of protein-rich ingredients such as soybean meal, recognized to have elevated contributions to environmental impacts. This study investigated whether the incorporation of l-lysine.HCl, l-threonine and FU-methionine reduces the environmental impacts of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment. The following impact categories were considered: climate change, eutrophication, acidification, terrestrial ecotoxicity, cumulative energy demand and land occupation. Several feeds were formulated either to minimize the cost of the formulation (with or without AA utilization), to maximize AA incorporation (i.e. the cost of AA was considered to be similar to that of soybean meal), or to minimize greenhouse gas emissions. For both pig and broiler feeds, calculations were made first using only cereals and soybean meal as main ingredients and then using cereals and several protein-rich ingredients (soybean meal, rapeseed meal and peas). In addition, these calculations were performed using two types of soybean meal (from Brazil, associated with recent deforestation or not). For broiler feeds, two types of maize (from France, irrigated, with mineral fertilization v. not irrigated, with animal manure fertilization) were also tested. Regarding the feeds formulated to minimize cost, incorporation of AA decreased the values for eutrophication, terrestrial ecotoxicity and cumulative energy demand of both pig and broiler feeds, regardless of the base ingredients. Reduction in climate change and acidification due to the incorporation of AA depended on the nature of the feed ingredients, with the effect of AA incorporation being greater when combined with ingredients with high impacts such as soybean meal associated with deforestation. Feeds formulated to maximize AA incorporation generally had a similar composition to those formulated to minimize cost, suggesting that the costs of AA were not the limiting factor in their incorporation. Feeds formulated to minimize greenhouse gas emissions had the lowest values for climate change and cumulative energy demand, but not for other impacts. Further research is needed to elucidate whether the incorporation of additional AA (tryptophan and valine) along with L-lysine, L-threonine and FU-methionine could decrease on the environmental impacts of pig and broiler feeds further.
机译:在日粮中添加饲料使用(FU)氨基酸(AAs)导致减少使用富含蛋白质的成分(例如豆粕),这被认为对环境的影响有所提高。这项研究使用生命周期评估法研究了将L-赖氨酸,HCl,L-苏氨酸和FU-蛋氨酸的掺入是否降低了猪和肉鸡饲料对环境的影响。考虑了以下影响类别:气候变化,富营养化,酸化,陆地生态毒性,累积能源需求和土地占用。配制了几种饲料以最小化制剂成本(使用或不使用AA的成本),最大化AA的掺入量(即AA的成本被认为与豆粕的成本相似)或最小化温室气体排放。对于猪和肉鸡饲料,首先仅使用谷物和豆粕作为主要成分,然后使用谷物和几种富含蛋白质的成分(大豆粉,菜籽粉和豌豆)进行计算。此外,这些计算是使用两种类型的豆粕(来自巴西,是否与近期森林砍伐相关)进行的。对于肉鸡饲料,还测试了两种类型的玉米(来自法国的灌溉水,矿物肥料 v。未灌溉,动物粪便肥料)。关于为使成本最小化而配制的饲料,无论基础成分如何,AA的加入都会降低猪和肉鸡饲料的富营养化,陆地生态毒性和累积能量需求。由于掺入AA而导致的气候变化和酸化的减少取决于饲料成分的性质,当与具有高影响力的成分例如与森林砍伐相关的豆粕结合使用时,AA掺入的效果更大。为最大限度地吸收AA而配制的饲料通常与为使成本最小化而配制的饲料具有相似的组成,这表明AA的成本不是其掺入的限制因素。为减少温室气体排放而配制的饲料在气候变化和累积能源需求方面的价值最低,但没有其他影响。需要进一步的研究来阐明是否将其他氨基酸(色氨酸和缬氨酸)与L-赖氨酸,L-苏氨酸和FU-蛋氨酸一起掺入对猪和肉鸡饲料的环境影响是否进一步降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号