...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine >A randomized controlled trial of parental asthma coaching to improve outcomes among urban minority children.
【24h】

A randomized controlled trial of parental asthma coaching to improve outcomes among urban minority children.

机译:的随机对照试验的哮喘指导城市少数民族的改善结果的孩子。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether asthma coaching decreases emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations and increases outpatient asthma monitoring visits. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Urban tertiary care children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Primary caregivers (hereafter referred to as parents) of children aged 2 to 10 years with asthma who have Medicaid insurance coverage and are urban residents who were attending the ED for acute asthma care. INTERVENTION: Eighteen months of participating in usual care (control group) vs receiving coaching focused on asthma home management, completion of periodic outpatient asthma monitoring visits, and development of a collaborative relationship with a primary care provider (intervention group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was ED visits. Secondary outcomes were hospitalizations and asthma monitoring visits (nonacute visits focused on asthma care). Outcomes were measured during the year before and 2 years after enrollment. RESULTS: We included 120 intervention parents and 121 control parents. More children of coached parents had at least 1 asthma monitoring visit after enrollment (relative risk [RR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.41), but proportions with at least 4 asthma monitoring visits during 2 years were low (20.0% in the intervention group vs 9.9% in the control group). Similar proportions of children in both study groups had at least 1 ED visit (59.2% in the intervention group vs 62.8% in the control group; RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.77-1.15) and at least 1 hospitalization (24.2% in the intervention group vs 26.4% in the control group; 0.91; 0.59-1.41) after enrollment. An ED visit after enrollment was more likely if an ED visit had occurred before enrollment (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.16-1.86; adjusted for study group), but risk was similar in both study groups when adjusted for previous ED visits (1.02; 0.82-1.27). CONCLUSION: This parental asthma coaching intervention increased outpatient asthma monitoring visits (although infrequent) but did not decrease ED visits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00149500.
机译:目的:调查是否哮喘指导减少急诊科(ED)访问增加住院和门诊哮喘监控访问。审判。医院。(以下称为父母)的孩子2到10岁哮喘医疗补助保险和城市居民参加了ED对急性哮喘护理。干预:18个月的参与常规治疗(对照组)和接受指导专注于哮喘家庭管理,完成定期门诊哮喘监测访问合作关系的发展初级保健提供者(干预组)。主要结果测量:主要结果是艾德访问。和哮喘监测访问(nonacute访问专注于哮喘护理)。在前一年和2年之后招生。父母和121控制的父母。指导父母至少1哮喘监测入学后访问(相对危险度(RR), 1.21;95%可信区间(CI), 1.04 - -1.41),但是比例至少4哮喘监测访问期间2年较低(20.0%)干预组和对照组的9.9%)。类似比例的儿童在学习组织至少有1 ED访问(59.2%干预组和对照组的62.8%;RR 0.94;住院(干预组的24.2%与对照组的26.4%;在入学之后。更有可能如果ED访问发生入学前(RR, 1.46;调整的研究小组),但是风险是相似的在这两个学习小组调整前的时候ED访问(1.02;父母的哮喘指导干预增加(尽管门诊哮喘监测访问罕见的)但没有减少访问。注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00149500。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号