...
首页> 外文期刊>Nanoscale >Versailles project on advanced materials and standards (VAMAS) interlaboratory study on measuring the number concentration of colloidal gold nanoparticles
【24h】

Versailles project on advanced materials and standards (VAMAS) interlaboratory study on measuring the number concentration of colloidal gold nanoparticles

机译:项目在先进材料和凡尔赛宫标准(VAMAS)多个实验室的研究测量浓度的胶体金纳米粒子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We describe the outcome of a large international interlaboratory study of the measurement of particle number concentration of colloidal nanoparticles, project 10 of the technical working area 34, “Nanoparticle Populations” of the Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards (VAMAS). A total of 50 laboratories delivered results for the number concentration of 30 nm gold colloidal nanoparticles measured using particle tracking analysis (PTA), single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (spICP-MS), ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) light spectroscopy, centrifugal liquid sedimentation (CLS) and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). The study provides quantitative data to evaluate the repeatability of these methods and their reproducibility in the measurement of number concentration of model nanoparticle systems following a common measurement protocol. We find that the population-averaging methods of SAXS, CLS and UV-Vis have high measurement repeatability and reproducibility, with between-labs variability of 2.6%, 11% and 1.4% respectively. However, results may be significantly biased for reasons including inaccurate material properties whose values are used to compute the number concentration. Particle-counting method results are less reproducibile than population-averaging methods, with measured between-labs variability of 68% and 46% for PTA and spICP-MS respectively. This study provides the stakeholder community with important comparative data to underpin measurement reproducibility and method validation for number concentration of nanoparticles.
机译:我们描述一个大型国际的结果多个实验室的测量的研究粒子数浓度的胶体纳米颗粒、项目10的技术工作区域34岁的“纳米颗粒数量”先进的材料和凡尔赛宫的项目标准(VAMAS)。交付的数量浓度的结果30纳米金胶体纳米颗粒测量使用粒子跟踪分析(PTA)、单粒子电感耦合等离子体质谱法(spICP-MS),可见-紫外灯光谱学、离心液体沉降(CLS)和小角x射线散射(粉煤灰)。这项研究提供了量化数据来评估这些方法和他们的可重复性再现性测量的数字浓度的纳米粒子系统模型常见的测量后协议。population-averaging粉煤灰的方法,CLS和紫外可见有很高的测量重复性和再现性,between-labs可变性的2.6%、11%和1.4%分别。明显带有偏见的原因包括不准确的材料属性的值用于计算数量浓度。粒子计数法结果更少reproducibile population-averaging方法相比,68%,测量between-labs可变性PTA和spICP-MS分别为46%。为利益相关者群体提供了重要比较测量数据来支撑再现性和方法验证号码纳米粒子的浓度。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号