...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative Inquiry >Disruptions of Post-Qualitative Education Research: Tensions and Openings
【24h】

Disruptions of Post-Qualitative Education Research: Tensions and Openings

机译:中断Post-Qualitative教育研究:紧张和空缺

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This article speaks up for those who are feeling unheard as post-qualitative inquirers. It also speaks with hope, helpfully, to those in positions of supervision and mentorship to help student researchers work across post paradigms, becoming allies with those who are attempting to experiment with new theory, figurative forms, and processes. Addressing some of the tensions we have experienced between traditional qualitative and emerging post-qualitative researchers enables us to specifically name disruptions that block, silence, and misalign. We also share openings as possibilities that remain with the tension and do not offer advice or recipes to follow. This is exactly the type of reductive process that post-qualitative research is trying to circumnavigate. In the hullabaloo, this article is a clarion call for the academy to open up education research and make room for researchers who are unbounded by the invented rules of humanist tradition and familiarity.
机译:这篇文章讲了那些感觉闻所未闻post-qualitative查询。与希望,有益的监督和指导帮助研究生跨范式,与那些试图成为盟友尝试新的理论,比喻的形式,流程。经历了传统定性和新兴post-qualitative人员支持我们专门名称混乱,块,沉默,不重合。可能性仍然紧张和做不提供建议或食谱。完全还原过程的类型post-qualitative研究尝试环游。是一个感人的号召学院开放吗教育研究,使研究的空间无界的发明的规则是谁人文主义传统和熟悉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号