...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of behavioral and experimental economics >Institutional preferences, social preferences and cooperation: Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment in rural China
【24h】

Institutional preferences, social preferences and cooperation: Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment in rural China

机译:机构的偏好、社会偏好和合作:从lab-in-the-field证据实验在中国农村

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We examine institutional preferences, social preferences, contribution in public goods games, and their relationships by conducting a lab-in-the-field experiment in rural China. Specifically, we examine whether people contribute differently depending on whether they are facing their preferred enforcement institution (punishment versus reward); that is, whether there is an institutional match or mismatch effect on cooperation. We also examine what factors are behind their institutional preferences. We find that most subjects prefer reward over punishment. However, institutional (mis)match does not have significant impacts on contributions in the public goods game. Moreover, subjects who prefer punishment tend to be free-riders. We further find that there is a robust relationship between the preference for punishment and certain efficiency-reducing social preference profiles, such as anti-social preferences, which may help understand the institutional preferences.
机译:我们检查制度偏好、社会在公共物品游戏偏好,贡献,及其关系进行在中国农村lab-in-the-field实验。具体来说,我们检查人们是否这取决于他们的贡献不同正面临着他们喜欢的执法机构(惩罚与奖励);是否有一个机构或匹配不匹配影响合作。背后的因素是什么他们的机构偏好。奖励惩罚。(mis)匹配没有显著的影响贡献的公共物品的游戏。受试者倾向于喜欢惩罚免费搭车者。健壮的偏好之间的关系惩罚和某些efficiency-reducing社会偏好档案,如反社会的偏好,这可能有助于理解机构的偏好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号