首页> 外文期刊>Antiviral Research >Comparison of the protection of ferrets against pandemic 2009 influenza A virus (H1N1) by 244 DI influenza virus and oseltamivir
【24h】

Comparison of the protection of ferrets against pandemic 2009 influenza A virus (H1N1) by 244 DI influenza virus and oseltamivir

机译:244 DI流感病毒和奥司他韦对雪貂对2009年甲型流感大流行的保护作用比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The main antivirals employed to combat seasonal and pandemic influenza are oseltamivir and zanamivir which act by inhibiting the virus-encoded neuraminidase. These have to be deployed close to the time of infection and antiviral resistance to the more widely used oseltamivir has arisen relatively rapidly. Defective interfering (DI) influenza virus is a natural antiviral that works in a different way to oseltamivir and zanamivir, and a cloned version (segment 1 244 DI RNA in a cloned A/PR/8/34 virus; 244/PR8) has proved effective in preclinical studies in mice. The active principle is the DI RNA, and this is thought to interact with all influenza A viruses by inhibiting RNA virus synthesis and packaging of the cognate virion RNA into nascent DI virus particles. We have compared the ability of DI virus and oseltamivir to protect ferrets from intranasal 2009 pandemic influenza virus A/California/04/09 (A/Cal, H1N1). Ferrets were treated with a single 2. μg intranasal dose of 244 DI RNA delivered as 244/PR8 virus, or a total of 25. mg/kg body weight of oseltamivir given as 10 oral doses over 5. days. Both DI virus and oseltamivir reduced day 2 infectivity and the influx of cells into nasal fluids, and permitted the development of adaptive immunity. However DI virus, but not oseltamivir, significantly reduced weight loss, facilitated better weight gain, reduced respiratory disease, and reduced infectivity on days 4 and 6. 244 DI RNA was amplified by A/Cal by >25,000-fold, consistent with the amelioration of clinical disease. Treatment with DI virus did not delay clearance or cause persistence of infectious virus or DI RNA. Thus in this system DI virus was overall more effective than oseltamivir in combatting pandemic A/California/04/09.
机译:用于抵抗季节性和大流行性流感的主要抗病毒药是oseltamivir和zanamivir,它们通过抑制病毒编码的神经氨酸酶发挥作用。这些必须在感染时部署,并且对较广泛使用的奥司他韦的抗病毒耐药性已经相对较快地出现。缺陷干扰(DI)流感病毒是一种天然抗病毒药,其作用方式与奥司他韦和扎那米韦不同,并且已证明其克隆版本(克隆的A / PR / 8/34病毒中的1 244 DI RNA段; 244 / PR8)在小鼠的临床前研究中有效。活性成分是DI RNA,被认为可以通过抑制RNA病毒的合成以及将同源病毒粒子RNA包装成新生的DI病毒颗粒而与所有甲型流感病毒相互作用。我们比较了DI病毒和oseltamivir保护雪貂免受鼻内2009年大流行性流感病毒A /加利福尼亚04/09(A / Cal,H1N1)的能力。用单次2. ug鼻内剂量的244 DI RNA作为244 / PR8病毒治疗雪貂,或在5天内以10口服剂量给予总25. mg / kg体重的奥司他韦治疗。 DI病毒和oseltamivir均可降低第2天的感染力,并减少细胞向鼻液中的流入,并发展适应性免疫。但是,DI病毒(而不是奥司他韦)可以显着减少体重减轻,促进更好的体重增加,减少呼吸道疾病,并在第4天和第6天减少感染性。244 DI RNA被A / Cal扩增了> 25,000倍,与改善程度一致临床疾病。用DI病毒治疗不会延迟清除或导致传染性病毒或DI RNA持续存在。因此,在该系统中,DI病毒在抵抗大流行性A / California / 04/09方面总体上比奥司他韦更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号