...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of behavioral and experimental economics >Sources of deviant behavior: Contrasting alternative explanations in the laboratory
【24h】

Sources of deviant behavior: Contrasting alternative explanations in the laboratory

机译:偏差行为的来源:对比实验室中的替代解释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We explore the driving factors behind deviant behavior by contrasting three theoretical frameworks: stable preference for deviant behavior, impact from social history on pro-social behaviors, and contingent cooperation with social norms. Subjects in our experiment first play a repeated Trust Game to create social histories in the laboratory, before engaging in a Common Resource Game, to measure deviant behavior. The results suggest that social history is an important determinant. Those who experienced deterioration in the evolution of play were more likely to extract large amounts from the common resource. We also document that anticipated social norms in the Trust Game explain extraction in the Common Resource Game, independently from the observed outcomes and the anticipated norms of deviance. This suggests an under-adjustment in behavior to changes in norms. The findings do not support a stable preference for deviant behavior. Thus, our results suggest policy, intended to counteract social history and influence social norms, may be more effective than sanctions in combating deviant behavior. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:我们通过对比三个理论框架来探索偏差行为背后的驱动因素:稳定的对偏差行为的偏好,社会历史对亲社会行为的影响以及与社会规范的偶然合作。我们的实验中的受试者首先玩重复的信任游戏,以在实验室创建社会历史,然后再进行共同的资源游戏来衡量偏差的行为。结果表明,社会历史是重要的决定因素。那些在游戏演变中经历恶化的人更有可能从公共资源中提取大量。我们还记录了信任游戏中预期的社会规范解释公共资源游戏中的提取,独立于观察到的结果和预期的偏差规范。这表明对规范变化的行为调整不足。这些发现不支持对偏差行为的稳定偏好。因此,我们的结果表明政策旨在抵消社会历史并影响社会规范,可能比制裁在打击异常行为方面更有效。 (c)2017 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号